IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/revi24/341026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Saliência, relevância e determinância da carne bovina para os consumidores de Dracena (SP): uma nova abordagem metodológica

Author

Listed:
  • Groot, Etiénne
  • Henrique, Ródney Lúcio Pinheiro

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the beef salience, relevance, and determinance for consumers in Dracena – São Paulo State (Brazil), through two measurement methods. The salience was determined by Free Elicitation Method (FEM), relevance and determinance were calculated using the Multinomial Logit Model, with Case 2 Best-Worst Discrete Choice Experiment (EEDMP) data. To compare the determinance, preferences were also estimated by the Probit model, based on beef purchase intentions. At the time of purchase, the most salient attribute is the meat’s color, while the flavor and texture are the most salient attributes in the consumption. Results also show discrepancies between the determinance obtained by EEDMP and purchase intentions. The expressed preferences of purchasing intentions are closer to the specialized literature, which states that tasty, tender and bright red beef is the most appreciated among consumers. It is still premature to make recommendations on concatenated use of FEM and EEDMP to estimate the three characteristics’ dimensions of a product, such as beef.

Suggested Citation

  • Groot, Etiénne & Henrique, Ródney Lúcio Pinheiro, 2022. "Saliência, relevância e determinância da carne bovina para os consumidores de Dracena (SP): uma nova abordagem metodológica," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 60(4), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:341026
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.341026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/341026/files/Eti%C3%A9nne%20Groot.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.341026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:341026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.