IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/reowae/321872.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Use, Productivity, and Profitability of Traditional Rice–Wheat System Could be Improved by Conservation Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad, Mobarak Hossain
  • Begum, Mahfuza
  • Bell, Richard W

Abstract

Power tiller-driven plow tillage and crop residue exclusionary Traditional Agriculture practices are expensive, labor demanding, soil damaging, and eco-unfriendly. Over the last several years, pursuits of crop production through sustaining the productive capacity of soils, and environmental quality, have raised concern to adopt Conservation Agriculture worldwide. Single tillage combined with herbicides and crop residue retention principles of Conservation Agriculture are being developed. Between 2016–2017 and 2017–2018, a two-year on-farm experiment was done in Bangladesh. We practiced two crop establishment methods; Traditional Agriculture: Plow tillage followed by three manual weeding without residue preservation of previous crop and Conservation Agriculture: Pre-plant herbicide + single tillage + pre-emergence herbicide + post-emergence herbicide; under rice–wheat and rice–wheat–mungbean systems. Data reveal that the Conservation Agriculture was more cost-effective crop establishment technique than Traditional Agriculture in rice, wheat, and mungbean by increasing the ratio of benefit to costs by 24.3%, 35.7% and 48.8%, respectively, with a savings in tillage operations (66.3%, 58.1%, and 57.6%, respectively), weeding expenditures (59.2%, 24.5%, and 42.2%, respectively), and manpower requirements (25.1%, 27.2%, and 31.3%, respectively). This has resulted in an increase of 32% productivity of rice–wheat–mungbean systems with the yield advantage of 16%, 31% and 37% in rice, wheat and mungbean, respectively. When mungbean was added, the rice–wheat system’s productivity rose by 43%. The rice–wheat–mungbean system under Traditional Agriculture had the highest land utilization efficiency (99.45%), followed by Conservation Agriculture (92.05%), which expanded the scope to include additional crops into rice–wheat–mungbean system. Moreover, the Conservation Agriculture had a 59.7% greater production efficiency than Traditional Agriculture, where the rice–wheat–mungbean system having the highest production efficiency (53.00 kg–1 ha–1 day–1), followed by the rice–wheat system (45.57 kg–1 ha–1 day–1).

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad, Mobarak Hossain & Begum, Mahfuza & Bell, Richard W, 2022. "Land Use, Productivity, and Profitability of Traditional Rice–Wheat System Could be Improved by Conservation Agriculture," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 3(2), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:reowae:321872
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.321872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/321872/files/516-1330-2-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.321872?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mobarak Hossain & Mahfuza Begum & Richard Bell, 2020. "On-Farm Evaluation of Conservation Agriculture Practice on Weed Control and Yield of Wheat in Northern Bangladesh," Current Research in Agricultural Sciences, Conscientia Beam, vol. 7(2), pages 84-99.
    2. Taslima Zahan & Abul Hashem & Mm Rahman & Richard W Bell & M Begum, 2018. "Efficacy Of Herbicides In Non-Puddled Transplanted Rice Under Conservation Agriculture Systems And Their Effect On Establishment Of The Succeeding Crops," Acta Scientifica Malaysia (ASM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 17-25, January.
    3. Mobarak Hossain & Mahfuza Begum & Richard, 2020. "On-Farm Evaluation of Conservation Agriculture Practice on Weed Control and Yield of Wheat in Northern Bangladesh," Current Research in Agricultural Sciences, Conscientia Beam, vol. 7(2), pages 84-99.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard W. Bell & Md. Enamul Haque & M. Jahiruddin & Md. Moshiur Rahman & Mahfuza Begum & M. A. Monayem Miah & Md. Ariful Islam & Md. Anwar Hossen & Nazmus Salahin & Taslima Zahan & Mohammad Mobarak H, 2018. "Conservation Agriculture for Rice-Based Intensive Cropping by Smallholders in the Eastern Gangetic Plain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Productivity Analysis;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:reowae:321872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nassg.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.