IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/rdeeag/56854.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Futuros agropecuários em portfólios de máxima utilidade esperada

Author

Listed:
  • Silveira, Rodrigo Lanna Franco da
  • Barros, Geraldo Sant'Ana de Camargo

Abstract

This study investigates the composition of maximum expected utility portfolio, considering stocks, bonds, gold, dollar and agricultural futures contract, between August of 1994 and December of 2007. From the optimal combinations of risk-return (calculated by Markowitz algorithm) and the use of a quadratic utility function (with different levels of risk aversion), were obtained portfolios that maximizes expected utility. The commodity futures were not present in the maximum expected utility portfolios for the complete period, 1994-2000. However, with division of sample in two and three periods, the commodity futures were included in these portfolios during the 2000s. Furthermore, in general, with the risk aversion increase, the participation of these papers in the portfolio had fall.

Suggested Citation

  • Silveira, Rodrigo Lanna Franco da & Barros, Geraldo Sant'Ana de Camargo, 2009. "Futuros agropecuários em portfólios de máxima utilidade esperada," Revista de Economia e Agronegócio / Brazilian Review of Economics and Agribusiness, Federal University of Vicosa, Department of Agricultural Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 1-18.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:rdeeag:56854
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.56854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/56854/files/artigo%204.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.56854?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Risk and Uncertainty;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:rdeeag:56854. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/drufvbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.