IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/rdecag/151991.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitividade da Produção de Palmito de Pupunha no Espírito Santo e em São Paulo

Author

Listed:
  • Sousa, Eliane Pinheiro de
  • Soares, Naisy Silva
  • Cordeiro, Sidney Araujo
  • Silva, Márcio Lopes da

Abstract

This work aims to analyze the competitiveness of pejibaye palm heart production in Espírito Santo and São Paulo states by applying the Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). Results show that the private and social profitabilities of pejibaye palm heart production and trading were positive in both states and are higher than those obtained by traditional crops, such as soybean, and by forest products, such as natural rubber. São Paulo production was more profitable, being thus more competitive than Espirito Santo. However, these profitabilities could have been higher if producers were not exposed to negative effects of distorted public policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Sousa, Eliane Pinheiro de & Soares, Naisy Silva & Cordeiro, Sidney Araujo & Silva, Márcio Lopes da, 2011. "Competitividade da Produção de Palmito de Pupunha no Espírito Santo e em São Paulo," Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 49(1), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:rdecag:151991
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.151991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/151991/files/Artigo%207.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.151991?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:rdecag:151991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/soberea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.