IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/plecrs/320658.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Problem Of Assessment Of Linear Ordering Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Kądziołka, Kinga

Abstract

Subject and purpose of work: The aim of the work is to present and compare the results of selected procedures for assessing linear ordering methods. The considerations were carried out on the example of taxonomic measures of the security of cryptocurrency exchanges. Materials and methods: Publicly available data published on internet portals were used to assess the security of cryptocurrency exchanges. Composite indicators were created using the standardized sum method. The selection of the final representative was made on the basis of the similarity of rankings, the choice of the measure from the so-called efficient frontier, aggregate measure of the correctness of linear ordering methods and the PROMETHEE II method. Results: According to the values of all selected composite indicators, the Gemini exchange was the best in terms of the adopted criteria. Conclusions: Each of the analyzed procedures for selecting the final linear ordering method has its own logic, advantages and disadvantages

Suggested Citation

  • Kądziołka, Kinga, 2021. "The Problem Of Assessment Of Linear Ordering Methods," Economic and Regional Studies (Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne), John Paul II University of Applied Sciences in Biala Podlaska, vol. 11(2), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:plecrs:320658
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.320658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/320658/files/SEiR%204-2021%20K.Kadziolka...pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.320658?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:plecrs:320658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ers.edu.pl/en .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.