IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/orarao/48444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Métodos Para Apropriação De Custos Conjuntos: Uma Aplicação Na Indústria Madeireira

Author

Listed:
  • Eduardo Scarpin, Jorge
  • Eidt, Jorge
  • Lucia Boff, Marines

Abstract

The appropriation methods of conjunct costs is not restricted to the agribusiness, but can be applied in other economic activities, such as the timber industry. The objective of this paper is to apply and compare, using a descriptive plan and quantitative method, four appropriation methods of conjunct costs in a timber industry. The following methods proposed by Martins (2003) were used: a) equivalent to produced volume; b) proportional to market value; c) gross profit equality and d) act of pondering. In this study, some peculiarities of the timber industry researched were observed, for the following reasons: a) if all the co-products are the same standard measure and quality, then the ponderation will be the same; b) if the production volume is different, then the costs of the raw material should be proportional and c) the overall fabrication costs should be proportional to the dosage allocated in each production line and volume, due to the unfolding complexity. It was concluded that the method of act of pondering is the most appropriate for the industry studied and that the conjunct costs should be distributed by dosage of consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduardo Scarpin, Jorge & Eidt, Jorge & Lucia Boff, Marines, 2008. "Métodos Para Apropriação De Custos Conjuntos: Uma Aplicação Na Indústria Madeireira," Organizações Rurais e Agroindustriais/Rural and Agro-Industrial Organizations, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Departamento de Administracao e Economia, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:orarao:48444
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.48444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/48444/files/10%20-%2007.299%20-%20111%20a%20122.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.48444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:orarao:48444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deflabr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.