IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ngnjrs/285288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community participation and beneficiaries' perceived sustainability of community and social development projects in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Obar, E.E.
  • Adekoya, A.E.
  • Nkwocha, C.A.

Abstract

Development interventions are often targeted at alleviating community challenges and enhancing livelihood sustainability. However, most intervention efforts usually have short-lived impacts and the projects often degenerate into nothingness. However, community participation has been fingered as one major tool that can ensure the sustainability of community development projects. This study therefore examined the effects of community participation on the sustainability of Community and Social Development Project (CSDP) in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Multistage sampling procedure was used to select respondents for the study. Three communities each from the urban, peri-urban and rural areas where CSDP had completed projects were purposively selected for the study. A total of 168 respondents were randomly selected in these communities. Quantitative data on respondents’ age, sex, marital status, household size, community and social characteristics were collected using interview schedule. Data were analysed using frequency counts, percentages and mean, as well as PPMC and Chi-square. The mean age of respondents was 52.8±14.0 years; most (69.6%) of the respondents were males..More than one third of the respondents had tertiary education (43.5%). More than half (53.0%) of the respondents spent 2-5 hours in community development, (56.6%) participated in the project, (52.4%) were indigenes and (55.4%) were community project management committee (CPMC) members. The mean number of years spent in the community was 17.7±15.2 years. The area in which respondents participated most was sharing of idea ( X =2.39). while (55.4%) had high level of participation and (66.1%) indicated that the projects had high sustainability. Significant (p<0.05) relationships exist between project sustainability (r=0.415), age (r=0.281), number of years of formal education (r=0.154, number of hours spent in community (r=0.469) and level of community participation in CSDP. Chi-square shows that significant (p<0.05) associations exist between sex (χ2=9.721), type of community participation (χ2=26.820), status in the community (χ2=41.985) and level of community participation. It was observed that males participated more in community development than females. Also, technical sustainability of projects was found to be low. Therefore efforts should be made to encourage youths to participate in community development.

Suggested Citation

  • Obar, E.E. & Adekoya, A.E. & Nkwocha, C.A., 2017. "Community participation and beneficiaries' perceived sustainability of community and social development projects in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria," Nigerian Journal of Rural Sociology, Rural Sociological Association of Nigeria, vol. 17(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:285288
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.285288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/285288/files/4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.285288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Community/Rural/Urban Development;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:285288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rusanea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.