IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jrapmc/339922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Popping the Question: The In uence of Survey Design on Estimated Visitor Spending in a Region

Author

Listed:
  • Gabe, Todd
  • McConnon, James C.

Abstract

Regional scientists often use surveys to collect spending data as a first step in conducting state and local economic impact studies. This paper examines the influence of survey question type and wording on the information obtained about the expenditures of over 2,100 cruise passengers that visited Bar Harbor, Maine. Results show that average total spending amounts reported per passenger are not statistically different between surveys using open-ended ($104 per passenger) and categorical ($107 per passenger) expenditure questions. On the other hand, sample averages from surveys asking two different passenger spending questions-about group and personal purchases-are statistically different in ve of eight product categories (e.g., meals and drinks, souvenirs) considered. A comparison of these survey results to per-passenger spending amounts from a regression analysis of taxable restaurant sales in the Bar Harbor region is used to estimate possible data reporting errors made by survey respondents. The study results suggest that Bar Harbor cruise passengers made expenditures of between $16.9 million and $23.2 million in 2017, and these visitors accounted for an estimated 3.6 to 6.0 percent of annual restaurant sales. The methods and results of this study may be of interest to regional scientists and organizations that conduct expenditure surveys used in economic impact analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabe, Todd & McConnon, James C., 2018. "Popping the Question: The In uence of Survey Design on Estimated Visitor Spending in a Region," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 48(4), August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jrapmc:339922
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.339922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/339922/files/Gabe.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.339922?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jrapmc:339922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mcrsaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.