IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jordng/45683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefit-Cost Analysis of Biodiesel Production in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Sang-Min
  • Han, Hye-Sung

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to take a close look at Korea‘s biodiesel developing trends and assess economic feasibility based on benefit-cost analysis. This study finally presents directions to actively promote the biodiesel in Korea. The role of bio-energy is significantly emphasized due to the continuous rise in oil price and environmental problems. According to some researches that have considered various factors such as breed, productivity, production costs and levels of technology, the most feasible bio-ingredients are rape and barley. By means of the benefit-cost analysis, rape has positive values in the net profits when considered with indirect benefits. Also, it is estimated that rape is feasible when produced in place of barley for double-cropping. Soybean is feasible when cultivated in fallow grounds. When all factors are taken into consideration, the government's support has to be continued in order to reduce a burden of production costs at the initial stage of the biofuel's introduction. It is necessary to develop technology to minimize environmental impact and the requirement of grain production to the extent of the existing cultivation system. Moreover, considering the characteristics of each crop and a detailed strategy on each crop for improving productivity and reducing production cost are required.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Sang-Min & Han, Hye-Sung, 2008. "Benefit-Cost Analysis of Biodiesel Production in Korea," Journal of Rural Development/Nongchon-Gyeongje, Korea Rural Economic Institute, vol. 31(5), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jordng:45683
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.45683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/45683/files/JRD31-5-03.PDF
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.45683?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chang-Gi Min & Jong Keun Park & Don Hur & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2015. "The Economic Viability of Renewable Portfolio Standard Support for Offshore Wind Farm Projects in Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jordng:45683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kreinkr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.