IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jordng/288036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural Commodity Programs in the Unites States: Reform, Reversal and WTO implications

Author

Listed:
  • Sumner, Daniel A.
  • Choi, Jungsup

Abstract

American farm programs have gradually evolved over decades, and the FAIR Act continued the significant changes in form of the subsidy by reducing the effects on production. The large recent payments to U.S farmers continue to affect trade somewhat. But. these payments should not limit progress in the new WTO agricultural round if it focuses on border measures. For this WTO round, the U.S. could facilitate liberal trade by proposing the elimination of agricultural tariffs, export subsidies, and export taxes or embargoes. Limits on the use of anti-dumping duties or barriers to block import "surges," reform of rules related to countervailing duties, and keeping science-based Sanitary and Phytosanitary rules are also vital to facilitate progress in negotiations

Suggested Citation

  • Sumner, Daniel A. & Choi, Jungsup, 2000. "Agricultural Commodity Programs in the Unites States: Reform, Reversal and WTO implications," Journal of Rural Development/Nongchon-Gyeongje, Korea Rural Economic Institute, vol. 23(4), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jordng:288036
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.288036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/288036/files/choi.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.288036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jordng:288036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kreinkr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.