IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlofdr/162117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in Willingness to Pay for Safer Meat and Vegetables

Author

Listed:
  • Ekanem, Enefiok
  • Mafuyai-Ekanem, Mary
  • Tegegne, Fisseha
  • Singh, Surendra

Abstract

With numerous food recalls in the last few years, food safety has become an important concern for the food industry and consumers. Millions of people are sickened and thousands die each year from consuming contaminated and unsafe food in the U .S. This paper compiles information on the profile of respondents to a survey on willingness to pay for safer meats (beef and poultry) and fruits and vegetables, and examines factors that influencing consumers' willingness to pay. A telephone survey was used to collect data from 1,000 participants in Alabama, North Carolina, and Tennes­ see. Results indicate that 22.5 percent of respondents definitely would pay more for safer food, while 29.2 percent said they were more likely to do so. About nine percent of the respondents said they likely would not pay for safer food and 33.4 percent indicated that they were somewhat willing to pay more. Only 4.4 percent showed no interest in paying more for safer food. Chi-square methodology was used to examine factors explaining differences in willingness to pay for safer meats and fruits and vegetables. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) was used in analysis. Willingness to pay for safer food was significantly related to gender, education, ethnicity, and marital status

Suggested Citation

  • Ekanem, Enefiok & Mafuyai-Ekanem, Mary & Tegegne, Fisseha & Singh, Surendra, 2009. "Differences in Willingness to Pay for Safer Meat and Vegetables," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 40(1), pages 1-5, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:162117
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.162117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/162117/files/Ekanem.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.162117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Consumer/Household Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:162117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fdrssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.