IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jloagb/317856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gauging the Economic Importance of Mississippi Agricultural and Natural Resources

Author

Listed:
  • McConnell, T. Eric

Abstract

Mississippi’s agricultural and natural resources commodities were studied and ranked by seven economic indicators for 2019. Four were direct effects of operations—employment, farm gate receipts, gross value added, and final demand sales; two were economic multipliers for gross value added along with a value added, base export multiplier; and the economic export base contributions. Six different commodities occupied the number one ranking for at least one indicator. Broilers and eggs (total receipts and employment) and soybeans (final demand sales and economic base contributions) were commodities that repeatedly ranked first. Mississippi’s base economic contributions from agriculture and natural resources totaled $2.22 billion. Three commodities—cotton, horticultural plants, and broilers and eggs—were key to bringing new money into the state, while others provided support to downstream processors and manufacturers, as well as other commodities. Across all indicators, soybeans, cotton, timber, broilers and eggs, and catfish were state leaders.

Suggested Citation

  • McConnell, T. Eric, 2021. "Gauging the Economic Importance of Mississippi Agricultural and Natural Resources," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 39(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jloagb:317856
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.317856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/317856/files/Gauging%20the%20Economic%20Importance%20o%20Mississippi%20Agricultural.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.317856?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jloagb:317856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaggea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.