IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jloagb/311341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption of Precision Technologies and Perceived Improvements in Cotton Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Kotsiri, Sofia
  • Rejesus, Roderick M.
  • Marra, Michele C.
  • Larkin, Sherry L.

Abstract

This paper examines whether adoption of precision technologies, farm and farmer characteristics influence perceived improvements in cotton quality. Using data from cotton producers in twelve U.S. Southeastern states and discrete choice models, we find that the use of soil sampling, maps, participating in agricultural easement programs, farm size, university publications, and expected profitability of precision agriculture are positively associated with the probability that farmers experienced improved cotton quality. This implies that farmers should also consider the potential cotton quality benefits from these technologies, in addition to potential yield and environmental improvements, when deciding whether or not to adopt precision technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kotsiri, Sofia & Rejesus, Roderick M. & Marra, Michele C. & Larkin, Sherry L., 2014. "Adoption of Precision Technologies and Perceived Improvements in Cotton Quality," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 32(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jloagb:311341
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.311341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/311341/files/Adoption%20of%20Precision%20Technologies%20and%20Perceived%20Improvements%20in%20Cotton%20Quality.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.311341?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jloagb:311341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaggea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.