IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlaare/302449.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is This Food “Local”? Evidence from a Framed Field Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Tongzhe
  • Ahsanuzzaman
  • Messer, Kent

Abstract

This experimental research studies consumer preferences for local food accompanied by various label definitions. 374 adult participants made purchase decisions for local oysters characterized by multiple definitions of the term local. Results show consumers are less willing to pay for local oysters when local is defined as harvested within 400 miles than they are for oysters harvested within 100 miles or 25 miles. Willingness to pay (WTP) also increases when local is defined as being harvested in a watershed from the same state of the purchase location rather than in an adjacent state. Interestingly, the highest WTP is when no definition of local is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Tongzhe & Ahsanuzzaman & Messer, Kent, 2020. "Is This Food “Local”? Evidence from a Framed Field Experiment," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 45(2), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:302449
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.302449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/302449/files/JARE%2C45.2%2CMay2020%2C%231%2CLi%2C179-198w_Supplement.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.302449?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiffanie F. Stone & Janette R. Thompson & Kurt A. Rosentrater & Ajay Nair, 2021. "A Life Cycle Assessment Approach for Vegetables in Large-, Mid-, and Small-Scale Food Systems in the Midwest US," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:302449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.