IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijaeri/339020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Field Screening Of Recombinant Inbred Lines (Rils) Of Quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa Wild.) For Resistance To The Pests

Author

Listed:
  • Asmaa Allaoui
  • Eric Nathan Jellen
  • Nadia Alami Idrissi
  • Abderrakib Zahid
  • Ouafae Benlhabib

Abstract

Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Wild.) cropping is very successful in Morocco. A breeding program was set up for 22 years ago to develop adapted, productive germplasm. Success of quinoa cultivation requires not only suitable germplasm but also sound production practices, including control of harmful pests that are likely to cause yield losses. The aims of current study were to (i) establish an inventory of quinoa pest’s species in five contrasting agroclimatic sites; (ii) assess the severity of pest damage; and (iii) screen 156 RILs for resistance to the predominant pests. Two trials were carried at Berrechid and Tiflet in 2017-2018, with three others at Bouchane, Meknes, and El Kebab in 2018-2019. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replicates. The insects were collected and inventoried during both experimental years. The pest impact was assessed through the percentage of injured leaf area at three heights of plant foliage, apical, median, and basal. The inventoried insects belonged to eight species and six orders. Aphis fabae, Myzus persicae (Homoptera) and Nezara viridula (Hemiptera), were classified as the most frequent species. Utetheisapulchella and Spodopetraeridani (Lepidoptera), were the least abundant. Tiflet and Berrechid recorded occurrences averaging 19.64 and 15.73%, respectively. Bouchane, Meknes, and El Kebab expressed an outbreak rate of 5%. ANOVA revealed very significant differences among sites, lines and, their interaction. The two-dimensional PCA graph identified four clusters. The PC1 axis gathers 64.34% of the total variability while the PC2 axis explains an additional 24.01%. The AMMI analysis revealed highly significant effects of the site, the genotype, and their interaction. The G×E explained 46% of the total variation, while the experimental site accounted for 28% and the genotype 26%.The examined RILs showed segregation for resistance and ranked from the most sensitive to the most resistant, such the C. berlandieri parent.

Suggested Citation

  • Asmaa Allaoui & Eric Nathan Jellen & Nadia Alami Idrissi & Abderrakib Zahid & Ouafae Benlhabib, 2023. "Field Screening Of Recombinant Inbred Lines (Rils) Of Quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa Wild.) For Resistance To The Pests," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 9(4), August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijaeri:339020
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.339020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/339020/files/ijaer_09__40.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.339020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijaeri:339020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijaer.in/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.