IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/iepeoa/245683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Analize Of Maize Production In Conditions Of Deficit Irrigation In Republic Of Macedonia

Author

Listed:
  • Pesevski, M.
  • Bosev, D.
  • Sekerinov, D.

Abstract

In this paper authors had done analysis of economic parameters in three variants of maize production. The first one (TI) is traditional way of production, where number of irrigation and water use for irrigation are based on free farmer choice. The second variant (FI) represents full irrigation, where maize was irrigated up to full field water capacity in depth of 1m. The third variant (DI50) is irrigation up to 50% from FI. They confirmed that for TI variant, average 10 868 m3/ha water is used by farmers, what means about 14 % more water use, compared with variant FI and 128 % more water use, compared with DI 50. Because of the fact that water saving is significant and water use is controlled, a high yield and better value of production was realized. According that, the farmers who will practice variants with controlled irrigation water usage, would have higher profit (average 13.5 indexes) of invested capital.

Suggested Citation

  • Pesevski, M. & Bosev, D. & Sekerinov, D., 2007. "Economic Analize Of Maize Production In Conditions Of Deficit Irrigation In Republic Of Macedonia," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 54(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iepeoa:245683
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.245683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/245683/files/Article%205.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.245683?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iepeoa:245683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iepbgyu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.