IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/gjagec/98081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Verfahren zur Korrektur des Embedding-Effektes bei der Kontingenten Bewertung

Author

Listed:
  • Meyerhoff, Jurgen

Abstract

The use of economic tools such as the benefit-cost analysis often requires determining non-market values of environmental goods. One of the appropriate measures to determine these values is the contingent valuation. As a stated preference technique it allows to measure non-use values as well as to value future states of the environment. However, the credibility of the contingent valuation is still under debate because people only state a hypothetical willingness to pay. One of the most debated elicitation effects of this method is the embedding effect. In this paper, two approaches to take account of that effect are presented. Both use follow-up questions in order to obtain self reports from respondents. Each approach was employed in one of two contingent valuation studies which aimed at determining people’s willingness to pay for nature conservation. The answers to the debriefing questions are analysed for each survey both for the whole sample as well as separately for users and non-users of the good in question.

Suggested Citation

  • Meyerhoff, Jurgen, 2003. "Verfahren zur Korrektur des Embedding-Effektes bei der Kontingenten Bewertung," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 52(08), pages 1-9.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:gjagec:98081
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.98081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/98081/files/3_Meyerhoff.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.98081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gjagec:98081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iahubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.