IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/erdnra/291819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rural space as a social representation. Case of villages in the Łódź Metropolitan Region (Poland)

Author

Listed:
  • Wojcik, Marcin

Abstract

The aim of the empirical research was to determine the degree of social cohesion on the basis of the perception of the specifics of the modern countryside (which is undergoing disagrarisation) and the values of rural environment. The case study illustrates selected social consequences of spatial policy regarding housing in rural communes in the suburban area of a big city (case of Metropolitan Area of Łódź). Unlike macro-scale studies, both Polish and foreign, micro-scale studies have shown that differences are even greater and concern neighbouring areas. The different ways of life are manifested in different behaviour patterns and levels of territorial identity. New residents of a village perceive space primarily in terms of functional utility (convenience of residence), while long-time residents attach sentimental value to it, due to historical continuity. In such a case, special attention is paid to social and spatial behaviour patterns stemming from the historical continuity of certain individual characteristics of functioning within a local structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Wojcik, Marcin, 2015. "Rural space as a social representation. Case of villages in the Łódź Metropolitan Region (Poland)," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 12.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:erdnra:291819
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.291819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/291819/files/2015_RAD_12_12_W%C3%93JCIK.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.291819?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:erdnra:291819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erdnnea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.