IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/erdnra/291810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differentiation of Czech countryside in light of the OECD typology

Author

Listed:
  • Hrabak, Jiri
  • Capkovicova, Andrea

Abstract

This study deals with the differentiation of Czech countryside in its relation to the delineation of countryside itself. Ongoing changes in the countryside bring about its increased differentiation. This trend also applies to Czech countryside, which can be characterized as highly differentiated. This implies a need to delineate countryside itself, as well as its individual types. The delineation of countryside is a long term focus of the OECD, whose methodology is employed in this study. Its scale, however, has been adjusted to the level of districts (LAU 1). This study attempts to shed some light on the existing differentiation and diversity of the Czech countryside. For the individual categories of the OECD typology, we observed selected socio-economic indicators (net migration, primary sector employment, educational structure and unemployment rate) and analysed the differentiation of these characteristics across the sets of municipalities. The observation clearly indicates that small municipalities in rural regions display worse socio-economic characteristics. In terms of the selected indicators, the analysis also reveals a significant differentiation caused by the regions’ geographic position.

Suggested Citation

  • Hrabak, Jiri & Capkovicova, Andrea, 2015. "Differentiation of Czech countryside in light of the OECD typology," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 12.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:erdnra:291810
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.291810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/291810/files/2015_RAD_12_03_HRABAK_CAPKOVICOVA.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.291810?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:erdnra:291810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erdnnea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.