IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/erdnra/158308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protected landscape areas and regional development (the case of the Czech Republic)

Author

Listed:
  • Tesitel, J.
  • Kusova, Drahomira
  • Matejka, K.
  • Bartos, Michael

Abstract

The focal point of this article is to discuss whether or not, or to which extent, nature protection can be considered a factor differentiating the level or speed of regional socio-economic development. We decided to use empirical evidence in order to test the historical belief that nature protection poses limits to economic development that may lead to stagnation if not decline in areas where it is applied. We used three large-scale Czech protected areas and tested the hypothesis saying that areas under special regime of management due to nature protection suffer from economic underdevelopment. Based on the analysis both of objective data and subjective reflection of the situation by local popidation we can conclude that protected areas should not be seen as territories a priori handicapped.

Suggested Citation

  • Tesitel, J. & Kusova, Drahomira & Matejka, K. & Bartos, Michael, 2005. "Protected landscape areas and regional development (the case of the Czech Republic)," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 3, pages 1-14.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:erdnra:158308
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.158308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/158308/files/2005_RAD_03_02_TESITEL.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.158308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:erdnra:158308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erdnnea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.