IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/erdnra/157619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of support for farms in less-favoured areas in the Czech Republic and Slovakia

Author

Listed:
  • Stolbova, Marie
  • Molcanova, Jana

Abstract

The background, criteria and scope of the spatial definition of LFA are very similar in both countries. Farm eligibility criteria are entirely different. In Slovakia the whole agricultural area of a holding is eligible for payment. In the Czech Republic it is only the area of grassland. Only the holdings breading cattle, sheep or goats at a given density per hectare are eligible in the Czech Republic. The aim of the paper is to compare the situation of LFAs in both countries andto particularly evaluate the impact of the different eligibility criteria at the farm level in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The impact of LFA payments on land use, production structure, and agricultural employment and on the economic results of farms is analysed on the basis of chosen indicators. The research comes to the conclusion that farmers are signifi cantly dependent on subsidies in both countries. The contribution of EU funds to LFA payment fi nancial resources has resulted positively in the decrease of unused agricultural land and it delayed the labour input decline in both countries. The differences of farm eligibility criteria have led to differing trends of grassland acreage and livestock number.

Suggested Citation

  • Stolbova, Marie & Molcanova, Jana, 2009. "Evaluation of support for farms in less-favoured areas in the Czech Republic and Slovakia," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 6, pages 1-17.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:erdnra:157619
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.157619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/157619/files/2009_RAD_06_19_STOLBOVA.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.157619?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Blandford & Berkeley Hill, 2008. "Directions in Rural Development Policy - Lessons from Both Sides of the Atlantic," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 7(Special I), pages 6-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chmieliński, Paweł, 2016. "Selected aspects of the development of rural systems in Visegrad Group countries," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 13, pages 1-12.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Partridge, Mark D. & Olfert, M. Rose & Ali, Kamar, 2009. "Towards a Rural Development Policy: Lessons from the United States and Canada," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 39(2), pages 1-17.
    2. John Davis, 2010. "Has rural development policy evaluation come of age? L’évaluation de la politique de développement rural est‐elle entrée dans l’âge adulte ? Ist die Evaluation der Politik zur Entwicklung des ländlich," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 9(1), pages 3-3, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:erdnra:157619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erdnnea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.