IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ecjilt/312211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Obituary of the Doha Round: A Path for Reinventing the WTO’s Future

Author

Listed:
  • Yigzaw, Destaw A.

Abstract

The World Trade Organization is in decline. Its dispute settlement mechanism faces an existential crisis. The Doha Round is all but dead. With the Covid-19 pandemic wrecking economies and exacerbating the spiraling income and wealth inequality, the road ahead for the WTO looks precarious. While many factors have contributed to the decline of the WTO, most can be traced to its design flaws. With the adoption of the Marrakesh Agreement, the scope of the multilateral trade regime expanded. However, such expansion was pointedly selective. While business and corporate interests were protected through the incorporation of traditionally nontrade subjects, such as intellectual property and investment, labour and development issues were sidelined. In reality, the operative rules of the WTO are not only inconsistent with the standard justifications for trade liberalization but also with the organization’s own stated goals. As a result, many came to view the WTO as an agent of neoliberalism spearheading the diversion of the wealth of nations into the wealth of corporations. Such single-minded pursuit of profit has not only undermined the legitimacy of the WTO but also has contributed to the creation a conducive environment for the rise of nationalism, populism, and protectionism, threatening the liberal international order.

Suggested Citation

  • Yigzaw, Destaw A., 2021. "On the Obituary of the Doha Round: A Path for Reinventing the WTO’s Future," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 22(1), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ecjilt:312211
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.312211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/312211/files/Yigzaw22-1lay.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.312211?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ecjilt:312211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esteyca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.