IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ecjilt/312209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dispute Settlement - Or Not

Author

Listed:
  • Kerr. William A.

Abstract

In December 2019, the WTO’s dispute settlement system ceased to function when the Trump administration allowed the number of Appellate body members fall below the minimum specified for the hearing of an appeal. The non-cooperation in the appointment of Appellate body members was deliberate. It was part of a wider strategy to loosen WTO constraints on US trade policy and has been a major irritant in US relations with trading partners. The incoming administration of President Biden has vowed to take a more cooperative approach to trade and dealing with the disruption to the dispute settlement system could be an important step. Dissatisfaction with the dispute settlement system is not, however, simply an artifact of the Trump administration. This paper explores the roots of US dissatisfaction with the WTOs dispute settlement system and outlines what avenues are available to deal with it. It concludes that the options are few and that instead of a reversion to a strong multilateral mechanism a return to something akin to the weaker previous GATT system may prevail.

Suggested Citation

  • Kerr. William A., 2021. "Dispute Settlement - Or Not," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 22(1), June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ecjilt:312209
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.312209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/312209/files/Kerr22-1lay.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.312209?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ecjilt:312209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esteyca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.