IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/338329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Chinese Herbal Medicine Feed Additives on Growth Performance and Dietary Nutrient Metabolism of Black-bone Chickens

Author

Listed:
  • YANG,Cui
  • WANG,Fulin
  • WU,Siqian
  • WU,Zhuyue
  • QIN,Limei
  • WAN,Huofu
  • XIAO,Zhengzhong
  • HUANG,Chunhua
  • YANG,Jiahuang
  • WEI,Fengying

Abstract

[Objectives] To study the effects of Chinese herbal medicine feed additives on the growth performance and dietary nutrient metabolic rate of black chickens. [Methods] 480 pieces of 1-day-old Donglan Black-bone Chickens were selected and divided into 4 groups, with 6 replicates in each group, with 20 pieces in each replicate. Among them, group A was the control group and was fed the basal diet; the groups B, C, and D were the experimental groups, which were separately supplemented with 0.25%, 0.50% and 1.00% of Chinese herbal medicine additives in the basal diet, and the experimental period was 70 d. At the end of the feeding experiment, 24 experimental chickens with similar body weight were selected from each group, and the same design of the feeding experiment was used to continue to feed the original diet for the metabolic experiment to determine the nutrient metabolic rate. [Results] Except the 50-70 d stage, the average daily gain (ADG) of group B in other stages was increased by 5.00-9.15% (P<0.05), and the average body weight of group B at 70 d was also increased by 4.86% (P<0.05); the ADG of group C at 36-49, 1-49 and 1-70 d and the average individual weight at 70 d were also higher than that of group A by 5.90%, 2.66%, 2.68% and 2.57%, respectively (P>0.05); at 36-49 d, the average daily feed intake (ADFI) of group A was higher than that of group B by 6.04% (P<0.01), and was also higher than that of groups C and D by 5.12% and 4.13% (P<0.05), respectively; at 1-49 d, the ADFI of group A was higher than that of group C by 2.86% (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the four groups of experimental chickens at each stage (P>0.05); at 22-35 and 1-70 d, the feed to gain ratio (F/G) of group B was 6.32% and 3.41% lower than that of group A (P<0.05), and at 36-49 and 1-49 d, the F/G of group B was even lower; at 36-49 d, the F/G of group C was 10.15% lower than that of group A (P<0.05), and at 1-49 d, it was also lower than that of group A by 5.29% (P<0.01); there was no significant difference between the two groups at other stages. In terms of nutrient metabolism: the three different amounts of this additive have increased the metabolic rate of DM, CP, CF, NFE, CA, Ca, P, TE and other nutrients in the diet to varying degrees, especially the addition of 0.25% and 0.50% had the significant increase. [Conclusions] The addition of 0.25% Chinese herbal medicine additives in the diet can significantly improve the growth performance and main nutrient metabolic rate of Donglan Black-bone Chickens.

Suggested Citation

  • YANG,Cui & WANG,Fulin & WU,Siqian & WU,Zhuyue & QIN,Limei & WAN,Huofu & XIAO,Zhengzhong & HUANG,Chunhua & YANG,Jiahuang & WEI,Fengying, 2022. "Effects of Chinese Herbal Medicine Feed Additives on Growth Performance and Dietary Nutrient Metabolism of Black-bone Chickens," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 14(11), November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:338329
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.338329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/338329/files/18.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.338329?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:338329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.