IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/316966.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional Differences and Optimal Allocation of Cultivated Land Utilization Benefits Based on Improved TOPSIS Method: A Case Study of Guangxi

Author

Listed:
  • SUN, Chuchu
  • GENG, Ning
  • WANG, Mengyao

Abstract

Taking 14 prefecture-level cities in Guangxi as an object, this paper explored the difference of cultivated land utilization efficiency in Guangxi, comprehensively evaluated the economic, social, and ecological aspects, and analyzed the regional differences in cultivated land use efficiency in Guangxi from 2005 to 2018 based on the improved TOPSIS method. By studying the quantitative change trends and spatial differences of the utilization benefit of cultivated land resources in Guangxi, it came up with recommendations for optimizing the allocation of cultivated land from the quantity and quality of cultivated land. It is intended to provide a scientific and theoretical reference for improving the use efficiency of cultivated land in Guangxi.

Suggested Citation

  • SUN, Chuchu & GENG, Ning & WANG, Mengyao, 2021. "Regional Differences and Optimal Allocation of Cultivated Land Utilization Benefits Based on Improved TOPSIS Method: A Case Study of Guangxi," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 13(07), July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:316966
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.316966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/316966/files/Regional%20Differences%20and%20Optimal%20Allocation%20of%20Cultivated%20Land%20Utilization%20Benefits%20Based%20on%20Improved%20TOPSIS%20Method%3A%20A%20Case%20Study%20of%20Guangxi.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.316966?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:316966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.