IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/309141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Different Inoculation Methods on Pathogenicity of Fusarium proliferatum to Alfalfa

Author

Listed:
  • LUO, Yinghua
  • LI, Mengteng
  • LI, Congyu
  • JIN, Chenghao
  • LIU, Xiangping

Abstract

[Objectives] To find out the suitable inoculation method for Fusarium proliferatum. [Methods] Longmu 801 and TG4 were inoculated with rice grain-based inoculum at the bud and seedling stages and with root irrigation at the seedling stage, respectively, and then, the plant height, aboveground biomass, underground biomass, incidence rate and disease index of the alfalfa were determined to conduct comprehensive resistance evaluation. [Results] There was obvious difference in disease resistance between the two alfalfa varieties. Among the three inoculation methods, the relative plant height, relative aboveground biomass and relative underground biomass of Longmu 801 differed insignificantly (P>0.05), all around 100. There were significant differences in TG4 among different inoculation methods (P<0.05). The incidence rates and disease indices of Longmu 801 and TG4 inoculated with rice grain-based inoculum at the bud stage were the highest, and their incidence rates and disease indices were 73.3% and 100%, and 40 and 60, respectively, significantly higher than those under the other two inoculation methods. The incidence rates and disease indices of Longmu 801 and TG4 inoculated with rice grain-based inoculum at the seedling stage were the lowest, and their incidence rates and disease indices were 0% and 13.30%, and 0 and 5.33, respectively, significantly lower than those under the other two inoculation methods. [Conclusions] The inoculation time and inoculation method of the pathogen both affect the inoculation effect. Among the three inoculation methods, the inoculation with rice grain-based inoculum at the bud stage is the most pathogenic to alfalfa seedlings, and can be popularized in the resistance evaluation of alfalfa to root diseases.

Suggested Citation

  • LUO, Yinghua & LI, Mengteng & LI, Congyu & JIN, Chenghao & LIU, Xiangping, 2021. "Effect of Different Inoculation Methods on Pathogenicity of Fusarium proliferatum to Alfalfa," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 12(07), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:309141
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.309141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/309141/files/Effect%20of%20Different%20Inoculation%20Methods%20on%20Pathogenicity%20of%20Fusarium%20proliferatum%20to%20Alfalfa%20%20%20.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.309141?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:309141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.