IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/174937.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil Erodibility of Slope Farmland in Guizhou Mountain Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Jian
  • Cheng, Li
  • Chen, Zhenggang
  • Zhu, Qing

Abstract

This paper studied soil erodibility of slope farmland in Guizhou mountain areas by the plot runoff method, analysis and test. Results show that the variation coefficient of erodibility K value calculated according to formula introduced by Sharply is low and relatively stable and accurate, so it is a suitable method for calculating erodibility K value of slope farmland in Guizhou mountain areas. K value of layer A slope farmland decreases with increase of years. The erodibility of entire soil layer is high, and the erosion resistance is weak. From the influence of different planting system and use types in 4 years, K values of different soil layers decrease, average reduction of A, B and C layers reaches 3.17%-11.64% (1.26%-12.34% for layer A, 1.29%-13.80% for layer B, and 1.26%-10.80% for layer C). Except engineering terraced treatment, the decline of K value of grassland, zoning crop rotation, economic fruit forest, grain and grass intercropping, plant hedge, and mixed forest treatment is higher than farmers’ treatment, and the decline level is grassland > zoning crop rotation > economic fruit forest > grain and grass intercropping > plant hedge > and mixed forest treatment. Planting grass and trees is favorable for lowering erodibility of slope farmland and improving farmland quality. Interplanting of corns with other plants can increase plant coverage and species, so it is favorable for improving erodibility of slope farmland.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Jian & Cheng, Li & Chen, Zhenggang & Zhu, Qing, 2014. "Soil Erodibility of Slope Farmland in Guizhou Mountain Areas," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 6(05), pages 1-4, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:174937
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.174937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/174937/files/22.PDF
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.174937?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:174937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.