IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/159090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Division of Township Grade System and Scope of Influence: A Case Study of Dafang County

Author

Listed:
  • CHEN, Xiaozhu

Abstract

At the township level, combining Voronoi diagram and breaking point theory, this paper divides township grade system and its scope of influence in Dafang County of Guizhou Province, and discusses the grade system from small scale perspective. Results show that Dafang County takes Dafang Town as the center, Dashi Town in the north and Shachang Township in the east as auxiliary part, Sanyuan Township, Zhuyuan Township, Babao Township, Pudi Township, Lihua Township, and Dingxin Township as cooperative part, to drive development of 36 townships in Dafang County. Thus, it basically reflects township grade of Dafang County, accords with current development situation, provides certain reference value for system planning and economic zoning of small scale regions, and it is able to improve the accuracy of scope division by completing attribute data and revision of many methods.

Suggested Citation

  • CHEN, Xiaozhu, 2013. "Division of Township Grade System and Scope of Influence: A Case Study of Dafang County," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 5(09), pages 1-3, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:159090
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.159090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/159090/files/13.PDF
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.159090?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:159090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.