IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/330359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling of the environmental risk management system of agroholdings considering the sustainable development values

Author

Listed:
  • Sumets, Alexander
  • Tyrkalo, Yuriy
  • Popovych, Nataliia
  • Poliakova, Juliia
  • Krupin, Vitaliy

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to improve the methodological approach to modeling the power set of the environmental risk management system of enterprises that are part of agricultural holdings taking into account the sustainable development values. To achieve this goal, the components of the environmental risk management system of agroholdings are identified; the types and nature of connections between the components of the environmental risk management system and the sustainable development values are substantiated; the power set is built. Methodology / approach. Methods of systematization, induction and deduction, as well as structural-process scientific approach were used to identify components of environmental risk management systems of agroholdings. The rules of logic and the provisions of set theory were used to argue that the environmental risk management systems of agroholdings should be formed as a power set. The method of expert assessments was used to prove the fact that the recognition of the values of sustainable development in the practice of management of agroholdings leads to positive socio-economic effects (by surveying 34 managers at different levels of management). Results. The components of environmental risk management systems that should be in enterprises that are part of agroholdings are identified. It is argued that environmental risk management systems of agroholdings should be formed as a power set. Empirical data show that the recognition of the values of sustainable development in the practice of management of agroholdings leads to positive socio-economic effects. Originality / scientific novelty. The methodological approach to modeling the power set of the environmental risk management system of agroholdings in the system of sustainable development values has been improved. It is based on the use of tools for the provisions of set theory and makes it possible to causally provide functional interaction between all structural components of the environmental risk management system. The methodological approach allows optimizing of environmental risk management. As a result, the decisions will reduce conflicts of interest between agroholdings and society. Practical value / implications. The practical value of applying an improved methodological approach involves the possibility of its use by agroholdings to make decisions to reduce environmental risks. Adherence to the values of sustainable development in environmental risk management provides positive effects and reduces conflicts of interest between agroholdings and society. Therefore, the improved methodological approach has good prospects for practical application. This was practically proved on the basis of empirical data of A.G.R. Group, Agrotis, Agrotrade, AP Group, ASTARTA-Kyiv, Agroprodservice, Agroton, ATK, Western Bug, MPR, PAEK, Ristone Holding, SVAROG, Ukrprominvest AGRO, HARVEAST.

Suggested Citation

  • Sumets, Alexander & Tyrkalo, Yuriy & Popovych, Nataliia & Poliakova, Juliia & Krupin, Vitaliy, 2022. "Modeling of the environmental risk management system of agroholdings considering the sustainable development values," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(4), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:330359
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.330359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330359/files/11_Sumets_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.330359?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Natalia Semenova, 2021. "Management control systems in response to social and environmental risk in large Nordic companies," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Yuanzhi Guo & Jieyong Wang, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Changes of Chemical Fertilizer Application and Its Environmental Risks in China from 2000 to 2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Sumets, Alexander & Kniaz, Sviatoslav & Heorhiadi, Nelli & Farat, Olexandra & Skrynkovskyy, Ruslan & Martyniuk, Volodymyr, 2021. "Methodical approach to the selection of options for ensuring competitiveness of enterprises in the system of development of agricultural clusters," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(1), March.
    4. Davide Settembre-Blundo & Rocío González-Sánchez & Sonia Medina-Salgado & Fernando E. García-Muiña, 2021. "Flexibility and Resilience in Corporate Decision Making: A New Sustainability-Based Risk Management System in Uncertain Times," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 107-132, December.
    5. Hao Zhao & Jinfeng Chang & Petr Havlík & Michiel Dijk & Hugo Valin & Charlotte Janssens & Lin Ma & Zhaohai Bai & Mario Herrero & Pete Smith & Michael Obersteiner, 2021. "China’s future food demand and its implications for trade and environment," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(12), pages 1042-1051, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sumets, Alexander & Heorhiadi, Nelli & Tyrkalo, Yuriy & Vilhutska, Roksolana & Pylypenko, Iov, 2023. "Modeling of the information system for agribusiness management entities," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(2), June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sumets, Alexander & Heorhiadi, Nelli & Tyrkalo, Yuriy & Vilhutska, Roksolana & Pylypenko, Iov, 2023. "Modeling of the information system for agribusiness management entities," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(2), June.
    2. H. Mahesh Prabhu & Amit Kumar Srivastava, 2023. "CEO Transformational Leadership, Supply Chain Agility and Firm Performance: A TISM Modeling among SMEs," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(1), pages 51-65, March.
    3. Hrosul, Viktoriia & Kruhlova, Olena & Mkrtchyan, Tatul & Zubkov, Serhii & Timchenko, Olha, 2021. "Enterprise integration and formation of cluster structures in the field of food sector," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(2), June.
    4. Idiano D’Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi & Jacopo Piccioni & Paolo Rosa, 2023. "The Role of Automotive Flexibility in Supporting the Diffusion of Sustainable Mobility Initiatives: A Stakeholder Attitudes Assessment," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 459-481, September.
    5. Aniruddh Nain & Deepika Jain & Shivam Gupta & Ashwani Kumar, 2023. "Improving First Responders' Effectiveness in Post-Disaster Scenarios Through a Hybrid Framework for Damage Assessment and Prioritization," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 409-437, September.
    6. Tomer Kedarya & Amir Elalouf & Rafael Sherbu Cohen, 2023. "Calculating Strategic Risk in Financial Institutions," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 361-372, September.
    7. Sehrish Atif, 2023. "Mapping circular economy principles and servitisation approach in business model canvas: an integrated literature review," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Anita Mendiratta & Shveta Singh & Surendra Singh Yadav & Arvind Mahajan, 2023. "Bibliometric and Topic Modeling Analysis of Corporate Social Irresponsibility," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 319-339, September.
    9. Md. Rayhan Sarker & Md. Abdul Moktadir & Ernesto D. R. Santibanez-Gonzalez, 2021. "Social Sustainability Challenges Towards Flexible Supply Chain Management: Post-COVID-19 Perspective," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 199-218, December.
    10. Katsuyuki Kaneko & Yuya Kajikawa, 2023. "Novelty Score and Technological Relatedness Measurement Using Patent Information in Mergers and Acquisitions: Case Study in the Japanese Electric Motor Industry," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(2), pages 163-177, June.
    11. Jamal Al Qundus & Shivam Gupta & Hesham Abusaimeh & Silvio Peikert & Adrian Paschke, 2023. "Prescriptive Analytics-Based SIRM Model for Predicting Covid-19 Outbreak," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(2), pages 235-246, June.
    12. Jacqueline Y. Sánchez-García & Juan E. Núñez-Ríos & Carlos López-Hernández & Alejandro Rodríguez-Magaña, 2023. "Modeling Organizational Resilience in SMEs: A System Dynamics Approach," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(1), pages 29-50, March.
    13. Ruslan Skrynkovskyy & Oksana Protseviat & Khrystyna Kaydrovych & Yuriy Tyrkalo & Sviatoslav Kniaz, 2021. "Тенденції Та Перспективи Розвитку Агропромислового Сектору Регіонів України [Trends and Prospects for the Development of the Agro-Industrial Sector of the Regions of Ukraine]," Traektoriâ Nauki = Path of Science, Altezoro, s.r.o. & Dialog, vol. 7(04), pages 6006-6015, April.
    14. Nagamani Subramanian & M. Suresh, 2022. "Assessment Framework for Agile HRM Practices," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(1), pages 135-149, March.
    15. Adrianela Angeles & Adriana Perez-Encinas & Cristian E. Villanueva, 2022. "Characterizing Organizational Lifecycle through Strategic and Structural Flexibility: Insights from MSMEs in Mexico," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(2), pages 271-290, June.
    16. Sviatoslav Kniaz & Nelli Heorhiadi & Lesia Kucher & Yuriy Tyrkalo & Anna Bovsunivska, 2023. "Development Of A Customer Service System In Electronic Commerce," Business Management, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, issue 2 Year 20, pages 64-82.
    17. M. K. Dhillon & P. M. Rafi-Ul-Shan & H. Amar & F. Sher & S. Ahmed, 2023. "Flexible Green Supply Chain Management in Emerging Economies: A Systematic Literature Review," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(1), pages 1-28, March.
    18. Ashish Dwivedi & Dindayal Agrawal & Ajay Jha & Massimo Gastaldi & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Idiano D’Adamo, 2021. "Addressing the Challenges to Sustainable Initiatives in Value Chain Flexibility: Implications for Sustainable Development Goals," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 179-197, December.
    19. Luay Jum’a & Muhammad Ikram & Ziad Alkalha & Maher Alaraj, 2022. "Do Companies Adopt Big Data as Determinants of Sustainability: Evidence from Manufacturing Companies in Jordan," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(4), pages 479-494, December.
    20. Susan T. Jackson, 2021. "Risking Sustainability: Political Risk Culture as Inhibiting Ecology-Centered Sustainability," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:330359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.