IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/afjare/333958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholders’ perspectives on the use of black soldier fly larvae as an alternative sustainable feed ingredient in aquaculture, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Ouko, Kevin Okoth
  • Mukhebi, Adrian Wekulo
  • Obiero, Kevin Odhiambo
  • Opondo, Florence Achieng
  • Ngo’ng’a, Charles Adino
  • Ongor, Dennis Ouma

Abstract

The use of novel feed ingredients from aquaculture is growing globally. However, their contributions to scalable and sustainable aquafeed solutions are unclear. New ingredients for feeds are desired in the framework of sustainability and a circular economy; thus, initiatives for implementing such novel ingredients are of interest to agricultural practitioners. As research continues on the potential contribution of insect-based feeds in aquaculture in Kenya, understanding stakeholders’ perspectives about the use of black soldier fly larvae (BSFL) meal is critically important. Given that no such studies have been conducted in Kenya, the overarching goal was to quantify stakeholder perspectives on the use of BSFL meal in aquaculture. Specifically, the objectives of the study were to 1) determine stakeholders’ perceived benefits and perceived risks regarding the use of BSFL meal in aquaculture; 2) identify the important considerations when legalising BSFL meal in Kenya; and 3) determine the driving factors to promote the adoption of BSFL in fish production. Purposive sampling was used to select forty (40) experts for a Delphi study, 24 of whom responded. The Kendall’s coefficient of concordance was used to assess the experts’ consensus. The results study results suggest that there is agreement among stakeholders regarding the need to use BSFL as alternative protein ingredient in aquaculture. There was a significantly higher perception of benefits of BSFL in aquafeed than of risks, signifying a high degree of acceptance. Sanitary policy and inspection, feed safety, environmental influences and fish quality were given as the top-ranked important considerations when legalising BSFL in aquaculture. Creating and enhancing fish farmers’ awareness of the benefits of BSFL in fish production (100%) was ranked as the most important driving factor, followed by identifying pioneer farmers of safe BSFL production and their introduction as the leading farmers. Consequently, the study recommends the need for academia, government and industries to collaborate closely to develop technology on the use of BSFL in aquaculture. If further recommends that the fish farmers and insect farmers should be engaged in the process, as this might increase the acceptance of BSFL in aquaculture upon its legalisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ouko, Kevin Okoth & Mukhebi, Adrian Wekulo & Obiero, Kevin Odhiambo & Opondo, Florence Achieng & Ngo’ng’a, Charles Adino & Ongor, Dennis Ouma, 2022. "Stakeholders’ perspectives on the use of black soldier fly larvae as an alternative sustainable feed ingredient in aquaculture, Kenya," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 17(1), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:afjare:333958
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.333958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/333958/files/4.-Ouko-et-al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.333958?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:afjare:333958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaaeaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.