IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/agr/journl/v5(510)y2007i5(510)p35-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural Instruments – the New Challenge for Romania. Investment Fields and the Beneficiaries for the Operational Programs 2007-2013

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana Mosteanu

    (Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest)

  • Meral Ibraim

    (Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest)

Abstract

One of the most discussed subjects after Romania entered the family of EU is about the absorbtion and allocation of the European Funds allocated using the Structural Instruments. The forecasts show that the maximum level of absorbtion of EEU’s funds is about 3.7893% from GDP. In Romania case the European Funds will be allocated for convergence, for cohesion fund and for teritorial cooperation, the largest amount being allocated for the convergence criterion. From this amount dedicated to this criterion (19.668 billion Euro) a share wil be cofinanced by the national funds, both private and public (total amount for national cofinance is about 5.07 billion Euro). Other criterion of grouping the European funds ist hat of Operational Programs for the followig domains: the increase of economical competition, transportation, environment, regional, human resources development and technical assistance. We expect to see if the forecasted level for absorbtion of European Funds was well done.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana Mosteanu & Meral Ibraim, 2007. "Structural Instruments – the New Challenge for Romania. Investment Fields and the Beneficiaries for the Operational Programs 2007-2013," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 5(5(510)), pages 35-40, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:5(510):y:2007:i:5(510):p:35-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://store.ectap.ro/articole/218.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ectap.ro/articol.php?id=218&rid=25
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Veronika Belousova & Nikolay Chichkanov, 2015. "Mobile Banking Adoption in Russia: What Incentives Matter?," HSE Working papers WP BRP 48/STI/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:5(510):y:2007:i:5(510):p:35-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marin Dinu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agerrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.