The Use of the Merton Model to Quantify the Default Probabilities of the Top 42 Non-Financial South African Firms
AbstractThe objective of this paper is to quantify the default probabilities of the top 42 nonfinancial firms listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. This paper follows the same methodology as outlined in the Moody’s KMV white papers in implementing the Merton (1974) model. The model of default prediction builds upon option theory as pioneered by Black-Scholes-Merton and derives the probability of default predominately from asset value, asset volatility and a firm’s leverage. The theoretical default probabilities of the top 42 listed non-financial firms are determined under base-case and worst-case scenarios and South African companies are generally found to have singularly low probabilities of default. This mainly reflects the low use of financial leverage by South African firms. This paper finds that there is weak correlation between Merton default probabilities and ratings issued by the rating agencies. The results of this paper indicate that the Merton (1974) model may, subject to limitations, be used as a source of information of the underlying credit risk of publicly traded firms in South Africa.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Africagrowth Institute in its journal African Finance Journal.
Volume (Year): 13 (2011)
Issue (Month): Conference Issue ()
Probability of default; Merton Model; Black-Scholes option pricing model; Distance to default; Moody's KMW; Ratings; Default point; Asset volatility;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- G33 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Bankruptcy; Liquidation
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Kirk De Doncker) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Kirk De Doncker to update the entry or send us the correct address.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.