IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aff/colart/y2022i53p111-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic imperatives of using institutional indicators of economic security in the management of sustainable development

Author

Listed:
  • Petro Makarenko

    (Odesa Polytechnic National University)

  • Tetyana Velуchko

    (Odesa Polytechnic National University)

Abstract

The subject of the study is the strategic imperatives of sustainable development management, which are understood as dominant priorities for a certain period of time. In this context, at this stage, they are most closely related to economic and national security and their institutional indicators. The purpose of the article is to define a set of institutional indicators, problems and possibilities of their use in accordance with the strategic imperatives of managing sustainable development. The methodological basis of the article is the methods and approaches of economic, institutional and theory of sustainable development. In particular, historical, monographic, system-structural analysis and synthesis, indicative are used. Results of the article. As a result of the study, it was found that institutional indicators of sustainable development are related to various spheres of activity: social, industrial and economic, monetary policy and currency regulation, public administration. They are different in nature, but they are united by normative and threshold values and constraints as favorable or critical for sustainable development. This concerns the quantification of the impact of formal and informal institutions, as well as the emergence of pseudo-institutions. Therefore, the institutional system and its dynamics – the modernization of existing institutions and the creation of new institutions – are of strategic importance for sustainable development. Field of application of results. Local self-government bodies, business structures, institutions of the social sphere, institutions of higher education. Conclusions. The interrelationship of the institutional environment, the presence of threats to sustainable development and the state of economic security of the country testify to the legality of using institutional indicators in the management of sustainable development. Under the condition of further research of the institutional components of economic security, a much more accurate and detailed description of the institutional component of sustainable development, the development of methods for its assessment, the determination of indicators, indices, and threshold values can be achieved. Regarding the institutions of civil society, as well as the institutions of sustainable development, they need further development. Therefore, the reorganization of economic security priorities and institutional modernization can be delayed for a long time, which should not be allowed. If the national government is able to combine the protection of national interests with the course of de-corruption, deshadowing, then this will be a big step forward on the way to institutional modernization and the system of economic security, and processes of sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Petro Makarenko & Tetyana Velуchko, 2022. "Strategic imperatives of using institutional indicators of economic security in the management of sustainable development," University Economic Bulletin, Hryhorii Skovoroda University in Pereiaslav, Faculty of Financial, Economic and Vocational Education, issue 53, pages 111-117, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:aff:colart:y:2022:i:53:p:111-117
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/2306-546X-2022-53-111-117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economic-bulletin.com/index.php/journal/article/view/886/882
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.31470/2306-546X-2022-53-111-117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aff:colart:y:2022:i:53:p:111-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Svitlana Kucherenko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffphdua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.