IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/infoec/v23y2019i1p5-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of the Most Used Machine Learning Algorithms for Online Fraud Detection

Author

Listed:
  • Elena-Adriana MINASTIREANU
  • Gabriela MESNITA

Abstract

Today illegal activities regarding online financial transactions have become increasingly complex and borderless, resulting in huge financial losses for both sides, customers and organizations. Many techniques have been proposed to fraud prevention and detection in the online environment. However, all of these techniques besides having the same goal of identifying and combating fraudulent online transactions, they come with their own characteristics, advantages and disadvantages. In this context, this paper reviews the existing research done in fraud detection with the aim of identifying algorithms used and analyze each of these algorithms based on certain criteria. To analyze the research studies in the field of fraud detection, the systematic quantitative literature review methodology was applied. Based on the most called machine-learning algorithms in scientific articles and their characteristics, a hierarchical typology is made. Therefore, our paper highlights, in a new way, the most suitable techniques for detecting fraud by combining three selection criteria: accuracy, coverage and costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena-Adriana MINASTIREANU & Gabriela MESNITA, 2019. "An Analysis of the Most Used Machine Learning Algorithms for Online Fraud Detection," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(1), pages 5-16.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:23:y:2019:i:1:p:5-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistaie.ase.ro/content/89/01%20-%20minastireanu,%20mesnita.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catalina Lucia COCIANU & Hakob GRIGORYAN, 2015. "An Artificial Neural Network for Data Forecasting Purposes," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(2), pages 34-45.
    2. Luminita STATE & Catalina COCIANU & Cristian USCATU & Marinela MIRCEA, 2013. "Extensions of the SVM Method to the Non-Linearly Separable Data," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(2), pages 173-182.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hamid Bekamiri & Seyedeh Fatemeh Ghasempour Ganji & Biagio Simonetti & Seyed Amin Hosseini Seno, 2021. "A New Model to Identify the Reliability and Trust of Internet Banking Users Using Fuzzy Theory and Data-Mining," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hakob GRIGORYAN, 2016. "A Stock Market Prediction Method Based on Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Independent Component Analysis (ICA)," Database Systems Journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(1), pages 12-21, August.
    2. Mahboubeh Faghih Mohammadi Jalali & Hanif Heidari, 2020. "Predicting changes in Bitcoin price using grey system theory," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Dhruhi Sheth & Manan Shah, 2023. "Predicting stock market using machine learning: best and accurate way to know future stock prices," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:23:y:2019:i:1:p:5-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paul Pocatilu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.