IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/infoec/v18y2014i3p77-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Models for Measuring E-Learning Success in Universities: A Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Iuliana DOROBAT (SCORTA)

Abstract

It is obvious that in the Internet era the higher education institutions (HEIs) must innovate the services they offer by integrating ICT (Information and Communication Technology) in the learning process. According to the theoreticians and practitioners insights in the matter, the e-learning systems offer many advantages and compensate the weaknesses of the traditional learning methods. In consequence, it emerged the need for developing a model that measures the success of the e-learning systems. This paper presents results of the research conducted in order to develop a comprehensive model for measuring e-learning system success in universi-ties.

Suggested Citation

  • Iuliana DOROBAT (SCORTA), 2014. "Models for Measuring E-Learning Success in Universities: A Literature Review," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(3), pages 77-90.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:18:y:2014:i:3:p:77-90
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistaie.ase.ro/content/71/07%20-%20Dorobat.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raed Masadeh & Ali Tarhini & Ashraf Bany Mohammed & Mahmoud Maqableh, 2016. "Modeling Factors Affecting Student’s Usage Behaviour of E-Learning Systems in Lebanon," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 299-299, January.
    2. Marya Wani & Vishnupriya Raghavan & Dolphy Abraham & Virginia Kleist, 2017. "Beyond utilitarian factors: User experience and travel company website successes," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 769-785, August.
    3. Alina-Mihaela Ion & Dragos Vespan, 2016. "Human Sustainable Development in the Context of Europa 2020 Strategy," Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, Eurasian Publications, vol. 4(1), pages 73-79.
    4. Marya Wani & Vishnupriya Raghavan & Dolphy Abraham & Virginia Kleist, 0. "Beyond utilitarian factors: User experience and travel company website successes," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    5. Luiz Antonio Joia & Manuela Lorenzo, 2021. "Zoom In, Zoom Out: The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Classroom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:18:y:2014:i:3:p:77-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paul Pocatilu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.