IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/apandp/v110y2020p91-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Economic Perspective on Algorithmic Fairness

Author

Listed:
  • Ashesh Rambachan
  • Jon Kleinberg
  • Jens Ludwig
  • Sendhil Mullainathan

Abstract

There are widespread concerns that the growing use of machine learning algorithms in important decisions may reproduce and reinforce existing discrimination against legally protected groups. Most of the attention to date on issues of "algorithmic bias" or "algorithmic fairness" has come from computer scientists and machine learning researchers. We argue that concerns about algorithmic fairness are at least as much about questions of how discrimination manifests itself in data, decision-making under uncertainty, and optimal regulation. To fully answer these questions, an economic framework is necessary—and as a result, economists have much to contribute.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashesh Rambachan & Jon Kleinberg & Jens Ludwig & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2020. "An Economic Perspective on Algorithmic Fairness," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 110, pages 91-95, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:aea:apandp:v:110:y:2020:p:91-95
    DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20201036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/pandp.20201036
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/pandp.20201036.ds
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1257/pandp.20201036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Rodríguez Andrés & Voxi Heinrich S. Amavilah & Abraham Otero, 2021. "Evaluation of technology clubs by clustering: a cautionary note," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(52), pages 5989-6001, November.
    2. Jonathan Roth & Guillaume Saint-Jacques & YinYin Yu, 2021. "An Outcome Test of Discrimination for Ranked Lists," Papers 2111.07889, arXiv.org.
    3. Krikamol Muandet, 2022. "Impossibility of Collective Intelligence," Papers 2206.02786, arXiv.org.
    4. Janssen, Patrick & Sadowski, Bert M., 2021. "Bias in Algorithms: On the trade-off between accuracy and fairness," 23rd ITS Biennial Conference, Online Conference / Gothenburg 2021. Digital societies and industrial transformations: Policies, markets, and technologies in a post-Covid world 238032, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    5. Guy Aridor & Rafael Jiménez-Durán & Ro'ee Levy & Lena Song, 2024. "The Economics of Social Media," CESifo Working Paper Series 10934, CESifo.
    6. Yoan Hermstrüwer & Pascal Langenbach, 2022. "Fair Governance with Humans and Machines," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2022_04, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, revised 01 Mar 2023.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • J15 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aea:apandp:v:110:y:2020:p:91-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael P. Albert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.