This paper examines the strategic promotion and wage decisions of employers when employees may be more valuable to competing firms. Competing employers must incur a cost to learn the quality of their match with a manager. Promotion signals that workers are potentially valuable managers in other firms and so can lead to turnover. To preempt competition for a manager, an employer may offer a wage high enough to discourage competitors from acquiring information and bidding up the wage further or hiring the worker away. This transfers wages from good workers to bad. More costly information acquisition yields greater expected lifetime wages. Copyright 1993 by American Economic Association.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 83 (1993) Issue (Month): 4 (September) Pages: 771-91 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Damiano, Ettore & Li, Hao & Suen, Wing, 2006.
"Competing for Talents,"
Micro Theory Working Papers
damiano-06-01-17-02-01-48, Microeconomics.ca Website, revised 17 Jan 2006.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Ettore Damiano & Hao Li & Wing Suen, 2005.
"Competing for Talents,"
Working Papers
tecipa-220, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Carolyn Pitchik & Aloysius Siow, 1997.
"Self-Promoting Investments,"
Working Papers
pitchik-97-01, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Jeremy I. Bulow & Paul D. Klemperer, 2007.
"When are Auctions Best?,"
NBER Working Papers
13268, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Jeremy Bulow & Paul Klemperer, 2007.
"When are Auctions Best?,"
Economics Papers
2007-W03, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
[Downloadable!]
Bulow, Jeremy I. & Klemperer, Paul D., 2007.
"When Are Auctions Best?,"
Research Papers
1973, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
[Downloadable!]
Benoit Julien & John Kennes & Ian King, 2000.
"Bidding for Labor,"
Review of Economic Dynamics,
Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 3(4), pages 619-649, October.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Julien, B. & Kennes, J. & King, I., 1998.
"Bidding for Labour,"
Discussion Papers
dp98-03, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.