IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adr/anecst/y1986i3p141-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'hypothèse d'équivalence entre impôt et emprunt : un test sur les pays de l'OCDE

Author

Listed:
  • Denis Kessler
  • Sergio Perelman
  • Pierre Pestieau

Abstract

This paper provides a short survey of the theoretical discussion on the equivalence between taxation and debt financing of public expenditures. It stresses that the key assumption in this debate concerns the behaviour of individuals towards their economic environment and public policy. Then, it turns to an empirical test of equivalence based on a new sample of 19 OECD countries for the period 1961-1983. The conclusion is consistent with previous studies: the case of equivalence between tax and debt financing is not established.

Suggested Citation

  • Denis Kessler & Sergio Perelman & Pierre Pestieau, 1986. "L'hypothèse d'équivalence entre impôt et emprunt : un test sur les pays de l'OCDE," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 3, pages 141-149.
    • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:1986:i:3:p:141-149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20075619
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stéphane Lambrecht, 2005. "Altruisme familial et dette publique," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 19(3), pages 159-188.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:1986:i:3:p:141-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ensaefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.