IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adf/journl/yid30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodical support for federal state standards for higher education

Author

Listed:
  • O. B. Tomilin
  • L. V. Fomina
  • O. O. Tomilin

Abstract

The present paper is categorized as a research paper. This paper proposes original methodical support for practices for Federal State Standards for Higher Education based on essential properties of competence: cross-disciplinarity, polyvalence, and cumulativity. Such practices consist of: basing contents of assignment corpora on taxonomies of curriculum study results founded on persistent skills in universal cognitive operations; methodical directions on developing technological competence formation roadmaps accounting for labour input for independent study; methodical directions on quantitative grading of competence levels using the accepted grading system. The proposed practices of methodical support for Federal State Standards for Higher Education allow for creative and well-grounded formation of modern educational methodologies that combine diverse types of graded assignments while also accounting for total labour input and planned labour input for independent study. The proposed recommendation and materials can be used for development of course documentation for Federal State Standards for Higher Education.

Suggested Citation

  • O. B. Tomilin & L. V. Fomina & O. O. Tomilin, 0. "Methodical support for federal state standards for higher education," University Management: Practice and Analysis, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and, issue 5.
    • Handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y::id:30
    DOI: 10.15826/umj.2016.105.042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/viewFile/30/31
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15826/umj.2016.105.042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y::id:30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.