IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adf/journl/y2022id1474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Independent Accreditation in Higher Education: Landscape and Design

Author

Listed:
  • M. M. Gainutdinov
  • M. P. Odintsova

Abstract

The article presents the outcomes of research of the landscape and state of independent accreditation of higher education programmes in Russia. It gives definitions of accreditation types and evaluation criteria of performance of accreditation agencies; a group of leading agencies was identified on this basis. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the usage of open sources of information (official lists and registers of accreditation agencies, registers of accredited study programs) with presenting an analysis of a spectrum of activities of Russian accreditation agencies and the outcomes of their work. A ranking of such agencies also was made. Following the results of research, conclusions on relevance of independent accreditation of study programs and growth prospects of such accreditation were made.The results of the study can be useful to the heads of higher educational establishments, including the heads of educational programs, for the reasonable choice of accreditation agencies that are more appropriate to their mission and strategic objectives. It also can be useful to the governing bodies in the field of higher education to monitor the state of infrastructure and the effectiveness of independent accreditation of education in Russia. Also the article can be helpful for applicants and employers.

Suggested Citation

  • M. M. Gainutdinov & M. P. Odintsova, 2022. "Independent Accreditation in Higher Education: Landscape and Design," University Management: Practice and Analysis, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and, vol. 26(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y:2022:id:1474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1474/1139
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y:2022:id:1474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.