IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aca/journl/y2020id216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological approach to evaluating the effectiveness of economic integration of CIS member states

Author

Listed:
  • T. I. Kuzmina
  • N. P. Savina

Abstract

This article is based on the analysis of existing scientifi and methodological approaches to the ways of forming the integration potential and to the assessment of the economic effi ofthe integration associations presented in the works of foreign and Russian authors, as well as in the accounts and reports of international organizations. The study made it possible to establish that the proposed methods do not satisfy the needs of a comprehensive and integrated assessment of the eff of integration, and the conclusions drown on their basis can show mixed results. It was proved that the growth rate within the integration trade exceeds the growth rate of trade of the CIS countries with third countries, i.e. there is no eff of the trade diversion. An algorithm is proposed for assessing the economic effi of integration using the example of the Commonwealth of Independent States using a performance evaluation system.

Suggested Citation

  • T. I. Kuzmina & N. P. Savina, 2020. "Methodological approach to evaluating the effectiveness of economic integration of CIS member states," RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Economics. Management. Law, Russian State University for the Humanities (RSUH), issue 4.
  • Handle: RePEc:aca:journl:y:2020:id:216
    DOI: 10.28995/2073-6304-2019-4-78-91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economics.rsuh.ru/jour/article/viewFile/216/205
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.28995/2073-6304-2019-4-78-91?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aca:journl:y:2020:id:216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.