IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v22y2018i11263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Leads Your Opinion? Opinion Leaders’ Influence on Virtual Engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Marcos Inácio Severo de Almeida
  • Ricardo Limongi França Coelho
  • Celso Gonçalves Camilo-Junior
  • Rafaella Martins Feitosa de Godoy

Abstract

Digital influencers are virtual opinion leaders that represent an alternative for companies targeting to advertise at the community surrounding these individuals. These individuals expand concepts of consolidated theories that examine the process of innovation diffusion and the flow of communication between opinion leaders and followers. Research about the power of these opinion leaders have in virtual social networks is still in its early stages and an obvious gap is how to measure the influence these opinion leaders have on engagement. This article details an approach that measures this influence on Instagram by analyzing all posts published in 2015 on four widely followed public profiles. Three hypotheses evaluated differences in engagement metrics provoked by individual (people) and institutional (institutional entities) opinion leaders. The two-stage least squares regression models confirmed the hypotheses that individual opinion leaders intensify engagement: postings on individual profiles produce significantly more likes, comments and word of mouth than posts on institutional profiles. Results from the empirical models are particularly relevant to companies seeking to raise interaction levels with their target audience on virtual social networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcos Inácio Severo de Almeida & Ricardo Limongi França Coelho & Celso Gonçalves Camilo-Junior & Rafaella Martins Feitosa de Godoy, 2018. "Who Leads Your Opinion? Opinion Leaders’ Influence on Virtual Engagement," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 22(1), pages 115-137.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:22:y:2018:i:1:1263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1263/1259
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/1263/1259
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:22:y:2018:i:1:1263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.