IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v21y2017i21209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contemporary Circus as Organizational Heterotopias: A Multi-sited Ethnography in the Brazilian-Canadian Context

Author

Listed:
  • Josiane Silva de Oliveira
  • Neusa Rolita Cavedon

Abstract

This study seeks to understand contemporary circuses from an organizational heterotopia perspective by carrying out a theoretical approach between Practice-based Studies in Organizational Studies and the concept of heterotopias, developed by Michel Foucault. Through a multi-sited ethnography focused on the organizational processes of contemporary circuses in Brazil and Canada, we identified sets of organizational practices altering the relationships of forces in the field of Arts in the researched contexts, resulting in the production of other spaces - or heterotopias, according to Michel Foucault - in society enabling the circuses to be constituted as organizations. We present the concept of organizational heterotopias as a theoretical contribution to analyze organizations based on socio-spatial multiplicity. The methodological contribution of this paper is the introduction of multi-sited ethnography as a research strategy for studies on organizational processes established in different cultural contexts and locations.

Suggested Citation

  • Josiane Silva de Oliveira & Neusa Rolita Cavedon, 2017. "Contemporary Circus as Organizational Heterotopias: A Multi-sited Ethnography in the Brazilian-Canadian Context," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 21(2), pages 142-162.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:21:y:2017:i:2:1209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1209/1205
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/1209/1205
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:21:y:2017:i:2:1209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.