IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eurcho/v20y2021i2p18-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

We Should Focus on Food Consumption to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • David Blandford

Abstract

Achieving the transition to a sustainable global food and agricultural system will require a shift in the pattern of production and consumption from commodities that generate substantial emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) to those that generate fewer such emissions. It is challenging to internalise the social costs of emissions by focusing on production in agriculture primarily due to the difficulty of measuring emissions from individual farms. By using carbon taxes at the consumer level and non‐price inducements to change consumer preferences, such as carbon labelling, significant progress can be made in transforming the food and agricultural system to a low‐emissions system in rich and middle‐income countries. Potential regressive effects of higher food prices can be addressed through income transfers and targeted food assistance programmes. A consumption‐based approach reduces the likelihood of international trade conflicts, since imports and domestic production are treated equally. Measures can be taken to offset any incentive to shift from supplying domestic markets to exporting. To make the transition to a more climate‐friendly food and agricultural system, important supporting measures will also be needed to develop new technologies and practices to reduce emissions per unit of output and to induce beneficial changes in land use. Réaliser la transition vers un système alimentaire et agricole mondial durable nécessitera un changement dans le mode de production et de consommation des produits de base qui génèrent des émissions substantielles de gaz à effet de serre (GES) vers ceux qui en génèrent moins. Il est difficile d'internaliser les coûts sociaux des émissions en se concentrant sur la production agricole, principalement en raison de la difficulté de mesurer les émissions des exploitations individuelles. En utilisant les taxes sur le carbone au niveau des consommateurs et des incitations non tarifaires pour modifier les préférences des consommateurs, telles que l'étiquetage carbone, des progrès significatifs peuvent être accomplis dans la transformation du système alimentaire et agricole en un système à faibles émissions dans les pays riches et à revenu intermédiaire. Les effets régressifs potentiels de la hausse des prix des denrées alimentaires peuvent être traités par des transferts de revenus et des programmes d'assistance alimentaire ciblés. Une approche fondée sur la consommation réduit la probabilité de conflits commerciaux internationaux, puisque les importations et la production nationale sont traitées de manière égale. Des mesures peuvent être prises pour compenser toute incitation à passer de l'approvisionnement des marchés intérieurs à l'exportation. Pour effectuer la transition vers un système alimentaire et agricole plus respectueux du climat, d'importantes mesures de soutien seront également nécessaires pour développer de nouvelles technologies et pratiques afin de réduire les émissions par unité de production et d'induire des changements bénéfiques dans l'utilisation des terres. Um den Übergang zu einem nachhaltigen globalen Ernährungs‐ und Landwirtschaftssystem zu erreichen, ist eine Verschiebung der Produktions‐ und Konsummuster erforderlich: weg von Waren, die erhebliche Treibhausgasemissionen (THG) verursachen, hin zu solchen, die beim Herstellungsprozess weniger Emissionen produzieren. Durch die Fokussierung auf die Produktion in der Landwirtschaft wird es zur Herausforderung, die gesellschaftlichen Kosten der Emissionen zu internalisieren. Die Schwierigkeit liegt dabei in erster Linie darin, die Emissionen einzelner Betriebe zu messen. In Ländern mit hohem und mittlerem Einkommen können durch die folgenden Maßnahmen erhebliche Fortschritte bei der Umstellung von Ernährung und Landwirtschaft auf ein System mit geringen Emissionen erzielt werden: Einführung einer CO2‐Steuer auf Lebensmittel und Agrarprodukte sowie preisunabhängige Anreize wie z.B. ein Klimalabel mit dem Ziel, die Präferenzen von Verbraucherinnen und Verbrauchern zu verändern. Mögliche negative Auswirkungen höherer Lebensmittelpreise können durch Einkommenstransfers und gezielte Lebensmittelhilfsprogramme aufgefangen werden. Ein verbrauchsbasierter Ansatz verringert darüber hinaus die Wahrscheinlichkeit von internationalen Handelskonflikten, da Importe und heimische Erzeugung gleichbehandelt werden. Durch entsprechende Maßnahmen könnte jeglichen Anreizen zur Verlagerung der Versorgung des inländischen Marktes hin zum Export entgegengewirkt werden. Um den Übergang zu einem klimafreundlicheren Ernährungs‐ und Landwirtschaftssystem zu vollziehen, sind außerdem umfangreiche unterstützende Maßnahmen erforderlich. Diese umfassen die Entwicklung von neuen Technologien und Verfahren zur Verringerung der Emissionen pro Produktionseinheit sowie die Initiierung von sinnvollen Veränderungen in der Landnutzung.

Suggested Citation

  • David Blandford, 2021. "We Should Focus on Food Consumption to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Agriculture," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 20(2), pages 18-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:20:y:2021:i:2:p:18-22
    DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12316
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1746-692X.12316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adrian R. Camilleri & Richard P. Larrick & Shajuti Hossain & Dalia Patino-Echeverri, 2019. "Consumers underestimate the emissions associated with food but are aided by labels," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 53-58, January.
    2. David Blandford & Katharine Hassapoyannes, 2018. "The role of agriculture in global GHG mitigation," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 112, OECD Publishing.
    3. Edjabou, Louise Dyhr & Smed, Sinne, 2013. "The effect of using consumption taxes on foods to promote climate friendly diets – The case of Denmark," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 84-96.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcelo Luna & Luciano Barcellos-Paula, 2024. "Structured Equations to Assess the Socioeconomic and Business Factors Influencing the Financial Sustainability of Traditional Amazonian Chakra in the Ecuadorian Amazon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Jonathan Brooks, 2023. "Agricultural policies and food systems: Priorities for indicator development," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 3-23, February.
    3. Qi Zou & Jinhui Zhao & Yingying Sun & Chao He & Zhouxiang Zhang, 2022. "Interprovincial Differences in Air Pollution in the Background of China’s Carbon Neutrality Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caillavet, France & Fadhuile, Adélaïde & Nichèle, Véronique, 2019. "Assessing the distributional effects of carbon taxes on food: Inequalities and nutritional insights in France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 20-31.
    2. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:6:p:972-988 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Stephanie Mertens & Ulf J. J. Hahnel & Tobias Brosch, 2020. "This way, please: Uncovering the directional effects of attribute translations on decision making," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(1), pages 25-46, January.
    4. Dogbe, Wisdom & Gil, José M., 2018. "Effectiveness of a carbon tax to promote a climate-friendly food consumption," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 235-246.
    5. Mario Herberz & Tobias Brosch & Ulf J. J. Hahnel, 2020. "Kilo what? Default units increase value sensitivity in joint evaluations of energy efficiency," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(6), pages 972-988, November.
    6. Cesar Revoredo-Giha & Neil Chalmers & Faical Akaichi, 2018. "Simulating the Impact of Carbon Taxes on Greenhouse Gas Emission and Nutrition in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Cécile Détang-Dessendre & Hervé Guyomard & Vincent Réquillart & Louis-Georges Soler, 2020. "Changing Agricultural Systems and Food Diets to Prevent and Mitigate Global Health Shocks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Louis-Georges Soler & Alban Thomas, 2020. "Is there a win–win scenario with increased beef quality and reduced consumption?," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 91-116, October.
    9. Dominic Lemken & Anke Zühlsdorf & Achim Spiller, 2021. "Improving Consumers’ Understanding and Use of Carbon Footprint Labels on Food: Proposal for a Climate Score Label," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 20(2), pages 23-29, August.
    10. Castro-Santa, Juana & Drews, Stefan & Bergh, Jeroen van den, 2023. "Nudging low-carbon consumption through advertising and social norms," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    11. Caillavet, France & Fadhuile, Adelaide & Nichèle, Véronique, 2018. "How does carbon pricing matter for a climate-friendly food consumption?," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273860, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Nicoletta Brazzola & Jan Wohland & Anthony Patt, 2021. "Offsetting unabated agricultural emissions with CO2 removal to achieve ambitious climate targets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Dominik Bär & Stefan Feuerriegel & Ting Li & Markus Weinmann, 2023. "Message framing to promote solar panels," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    14. Manuel González-Rosado & Luis Parras-Alcántara & Jesús Aguilera-Huertas & Beatriz Lozano-García, 2021. "Building an Agroecological Process towards Agricultural Sustainability: A Case Study from Southern Spain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    15. Revoredo-Giha, Cesar & Chalmers, Neil & Akaichi, Faical, 2018. "Measuring the trade-off between greenhouse gas emissions and nutrition due to carbon consumption taxes in the UK," 92nd Annual Conference, April 16-18, 2018, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 273481, Agricultural Economics Society.
    16. Bonnet, Céline & Bouamra-Mechemache, Zohra & Réquillart, Vincent & Treich, Nicolas, 2020. "Viewpoint: Regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and animal welfare," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    17. White, Robin R. & Brady, Michael, 2014. "Can consumers’ willingness to pay incentivize adoption of environmental impact reducing technologies in meat animal production?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P1), pages 41-49.
    18. Luca A. Panzone & Natasha Auch & Daniel John Zizzo, 2024. "Nudging the Food Basket Green: The Effects of Commitment and Badges on the Carbon Footprint of Food Shopping," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(1), pages 89-133, January.
    19. Roosen, Jutta & Staudigel, Matthias & Rahbauer, Sebastian, 2022. "Demand elasticities for fresh meat and welfare effects of meat taxes in Germany," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    20. Toke R. Fosgaard & Alice Pizzo & Sally Sadoff, 2021. "Do People Respond to the Climate Impact of their Behavior? The Effect of Carbon Footprint Information on Grocery Purchases," IFRO Working Paper 2021/05, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    21. Ariane Kehlbacher & Richard Tiffin & Adam Briggs & Mike Berners-Lee & Peter Scarborough, 2016. "The distributional and nutritional impacts and mitigation potential of emission-based food taxes in the UK," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 121-141, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:20:y:2021:i:2:p:18-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.