IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04554917.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What do internal stakeholders think about quality assurance in higher education? Literature synthesis
[Que pensent les parties prenantes internes de l’assurance qualité dans l’enseignement supérieur ? Synthèse de la littérature]

Author

Listed:
  • Wissam Belimane

    (Ecole nationale supérieure de management - pôle universitaire Koléa, Laboratoire d'Innovation Managériale, Gouvernance et Entrepreneuriat LIMGE/ENSM)

Abstract

This article aims to explore the perception of quality assurance in higher education by internal stakeholders. Data were collected through a documentary survey and synthesized using content analysis. The analysis revealed that the stakeholders considered have different attitudes to quality assurance, ranging from acceptance to resistance. In addition, they perceive many barriers to its implementation in the sector. The main contribution of this research is to lay a theoretical foundation for understanding the positions adopted by internal stakeholders towards quality assurance in higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Wissam Belimane, 2024. "What do internal stakeholders think about quality assurance in higher education? Literature synthesis [Que pensent les parties prenantes internes de l’assurance qualité dans l’enseignement supérieu," Post-Print hal-04554917, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04554917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04554917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.