IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcjaxx/v6y2018i2p206-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Context cultures, translation strategies and learning efficiency of accounting standards: experimental evidence based on ASBE and IFRS texts

Author

Listed:
  • Zongyan Li
  • Yu Qin

Abstract

Although the Chinese Accounting Standards for Business Enterprise (ASBE) has substantially converged with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in content, it adopts a localized style in terms of structure and language characteristics. As such, it differs markedly from the IFRS in linguistics. Using context culture theory, we compare the ASBE’s high-context feature to the IFRS’s low-context feature. Using functional equivalence theory, we identify the ‘foreignizing’ feature of the Chinese IFRS and the ‘domesticating’ feature of the ASBE texts, from a translation perspective. We empirically study the learning efficiency of ASBE and Chinese IFRS, and find that the ASBE high-context culture is not conducive to solving accounting problems and a domesticating translation is helpful to improving the learning efficiency of accounting standards especially in complex task models. We further explore text completeness and readability as intermediary factors in how context culture and translation strategy influence learning efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Zongyan Li & Yu Qin, 2018. "Context cultures, translation strategies and learning efficiency of accounting standards: experimental evidence based on ASBE and IFRS texts," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 206-229, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:206-229
    DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2018.1530184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21697213.2018.1530184
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21697213.2018.1530184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:206-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcja .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.