IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v63y2022i4d10.1007_s00362-021-01276-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A generalized information criterion for high-dimensional PCA rank selection

Author

Listed:
  • Hung Hung

    (National Taiwan University)

  • Su-Yun Huang

    (Academia Sinica)

  • Ching-Kang Ing

    (National Tsing Hua University)

Abstract

Principal component analysis (PCA) is a commonly used statistical tool for dimension reduction. An important issue in PCA is to determine the rank, which is the number of dominant eigenvalues of the covariance matrix. Among information-based criteria, the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) are the two most common ones. Both use the number of free parameters for assessing model complexity, which requires the validity of the simple spiked covariance model. As a result, AIC and BIC may suffer from the problem of model misspecification when the tail eigenvalues do not follow the simple spiked model assumption. To alleviate this difficulty, we adopt the idea of the generalized information criterion (GIC) to propose a model complexity measure for PCA rank selection. The proposed model complexity takes into account the sizes of eigenvalues and, hence, is more robust to model misspecification. Asymptotic properties of our GIC are established under the high-dimensional setting, where $$n\rightarrow \infty $$ n → ∞ and $$p/n\rightarrow c >0$$ p / n → c > 0 . Our asymptotic results show that GIC is better than AIC in excluding noise eigenvalues, and is more sensitive than BIC in detecting signal eigenvalues. Numerical studies and a real data example are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Hung Hung & Su-Yun Huang & Ching-Kang Ing, 2022. "A generalized information criterion for high-dimensional PCA rank selection," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 1295-1321, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:63:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-021-01276-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-021-01276-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-021-01276-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-021-01276-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jushan Bai & Serena Ng, 2002. "Determining the Number of Factors in Approximate Factor Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 191-221, January.
    2. Jinchi Lv & Jun S. Liu, 2014. "Model selection principles in misspecified models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 76(1), pages 141-167, January.
    3. Bai, Zhidong & Yao, Jianfeng, 2012. "On sample eigenvalues in a generalized spiked population model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 167-177.
    4. Ningning Xia & Zhidong Bai, 2015. "Functional CLT of eigenvectors for large sample covariance matrices," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 23-60, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barigozzi, Matteo & Trapani, Lorenzo, 2020. "Sequential testing for structural stability in approximate factor models," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(8), pages 5149-5187.
    2. Lettau, Martin & Pelger, Markus, 2020. "Estimating latent asset-pricing factors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 1-31.
    3. Liu, Yan & Bai, Zhidong & Li, Hua & Hu, Jiang & Lv, Zhihui & Zheng, Shurong, 2022. "RDS free CLT for spiked eigenvalues of high-dimensional covariance matrices," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    4. Maurizio Daniele & Winfried Pohlmeier & Aygul Zagidullina, 2018. "Sparse Approximate Factor Estimation for High-Dimensional Covariance Matrices," Working Paper Series of the Department of Economics, University of Konstanz 2018-07, Department of Economics, University of Konstanz.
    5. Shen, Keren & Yao, Jianfeng & Li, Wai Keung, 2019. "On a spiked model for large volatility matrix estimation from noisy high-frequency data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 207-221.
    6. Juan José Echavarría & Andrés González, 2012. "Choques internacionales reales y financieros y su impacto sobre la economía colombiana," Revista ESPE - Ensayos sobre Política Económica, Banco de la Republica de Colombia, vol. 30(69), pages 14-66, December.
    7. Bonhomme, Stphane & Robin, Jean-Marc, 2009. "Consistent noisy independent component analysis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 149(1), pages 12-25, April.
    8. Patrick Bajari & Victor Chernozhukov & Ali Hortaçsu & Junichi Suzuki, 2019. "The Impact of Big Data on Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 109, pages 33-37, May.
    9. Hertrich Markus, 2019. "A Novel Housing Price Misalignment Indicator for Germany," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 20(4), pages 759-794, December.
    10. Eliana González & Luis F. Melo & Viviana Monroy & Brayan Rojas, 2009. "A Dynamic Factor Model For The Colombian Inflation," Borradores de Economia 5273, Banco de la Republica.
    11. Claus Brand & Daniel Buncic & Jarkko Turunen, 2010. "The Impact of ECB Monetary Policy Decisions and Communication on the Yield Curve," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 8(6), pages 1266-1298, December.
    12. Chen, Jiaqi & Zhang, Yangchun & Li, Weiming & Tian, Boping, 2018. "A supplement on CLT for LSS under a large dimensional generalized spiked covariance model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 57-65.
    13. Kim, Hyun Hak & Swanson, Norman R., 2018. "Mining big data using parsimonious factor, machine learning, variable selection and shrinkage methods," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 339-354.
    14. Kinateder, Harald & Wagner, Niklas, 2017. "Quantitative easing and the pricing of EMU sovereign debt," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 1-12.
    15. Goodness C. Aye & Stephen M. Miller & Rangan Gupta & Mehmet Balcilar, 2016. "Forecasting US real private residential fixed investment using a large number of predictors," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1557-1580, December.
    16. Michael W. McCracken & Michael T. Owyang & Tatevik Sekhposyan, 2021. "Real-Time Forecasting and Scenario Analysis Using a Large Mixed-Frequency Bayesian VAR," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 17(71), pages 1-41, December.
    17. Alain-Philippe Fortin & Patrick Gagliardini & O. Scaillet, 2022. "Eigenvalue tests for the number of latent factors in short panels," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 22-81, Swiss Finance Institute.
    18. Philippe Goulet Coulombe & Maxime Leroux & Dalibor Stevanovic & Stéphane Surprenant, 2022. "How is machine learning useful for macroeconomic forecasting?," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(5), pages 920-964, August.
    19. Catherine Doz & Domenico Giannone & Lucrezia Reichlin, 2012. "A Quasi–Maximum Likelihood Approach for Large, Approximate Dynamic Factor Models," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 94(4), pages 1014-1024, November.
    20. Nektarios Aslanidis & Charlotte Christiansen & Neophytos Lambertides & Christos S. Savva, 2019. "Idiosyncratic volatility puzzle: influence of macro-finance factors," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 381-401, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:63:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-021-01276-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.