IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v63y2022i4d10.1007_s00362-021-01275-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Properties of individual differences scaling and its interpretation

Author

Listed:
  • John C. Gower

    (The Open University)

  • Niël J. Le Roux

    (Stellenbosch University)

  • Sugnet Gardner-Lubbe

    (Stellenbosch University)

Abstract

Indscal models consider symmetric matrices $$\varvec{B}_{k}=\varvec{X}\varvec{W}_{k}\varvec{X}'$$ B k = X W k X ′ for $$k = 1, \ldots , K$$ k = 1 , … , K , where $$\varvec{X}: n \times R$$ X : n × R is a compromise matrix termed the group-average and $$\varvec{W}_{k}$$ W k is a diagonal matrix of weights given by the kth individual to the R, specified in advance, columns of $$\varvec{X}$$ X ; non-negative weights are preferred and usually $$R

Suggested Citation

  • John C. Gower & Niël J. Le Roux & Sugnet Gardner-Lubbe, 2022. "Properties of individual differences scaling and its interpretation," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 1221-1245, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:63:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-021-01275-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-021-01275-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-021-01275-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-021-01275-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Carroll & Jih-Jie Chang, 1970. "Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(3), pages 283-319, September.
    2. Carl Eckart & Gale Young, 1936. "The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 1(3), pages 211-218, September.
    3. Le Roux, Niël J. & Gardner-Lubbe, Sugnet & Gower, John C., 2014. "The analysis of distance of grouped data with categorical variables: Categorical canonical variate analysis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 9-24.
    4. Jan Leeuw & Forrest Young & Yoshio Takane, 1976. "Additive structure in qualitative data: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 41(4), pages 471-503, December.
    5. John Gower & Niel Roux & Sugnet Gardner-Lubbe, 2014. "The Canonical Analysis of Distance," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 31(1), pages 107-128, April.
    6. Jos Berge & Henk Kiers & Wim Krijnen, 1993. "Computational solutions for the problem of negative saliences and nonsymmetry in INDSCAL," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 10(1), pages 115-124, January.
    7. Forrest Young & Jan Leeuw & Yoshio Takane, 1976. "Regression with qualitative and quantitative variables: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 41(4), pages 505-529, December.
    8. de Leeuw, Jan & Mair, Patrick, 2009. "Multidimensional Scaling Using Majorization: SMACOF in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 31(i03).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yoshio Takane & Forrest Young & Jan Leeuw, 1977. "Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(1), pages 7-67, March.
    2. Bolton, Patrick & Li, Tao & Ravina, Enrichetta & Rosenthal, Howard, 2020. "Investor ideology," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(2), pages 320-352.
    3. Richard Sands & Forrest Young, 1980. "Component models for three-way data: An alternating least squares algorithm with optimal scaling features," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(1), pages 39-67, March.
    4. Köhn, Hans-Friedrich, 2010. "Representation of individual differences in rectangular proximity data through anti-Q matrix decomposition," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(10), pages 2343-2357, October.
    5. Willem Heiser, 2013. "In memoriam, J. Douglas Carroll 1939–2011," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 5-13, January.
    6. Kadziński, MiŁosz & Greco, Salvatore & SŁowiński, Roman, 2012. "Extreme ranking analysis in robust ordinal regression," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 488-501.
    7. van Rosmalen, J.M. & Koning, A.J. & Groenen, P.J.F., 2007. "Optimal Scaling of Interaction Effects in Generalized Linear Models," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2007-44, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    8. Paolo Giordani & Roberto Rocci & Giuseppe Bove, 2020. "Factor Uniqueness of the Structural Parafac Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(3), pages 555-574, September.
    9. Alwin Stegeman & Tam Lam, 2014. "Three-Mode Factor Analysis by Means of Candecomp/Parafac," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 426-443, July.
    10. repec:jss:jstsof:34:i10 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Hye Won Suk & Heungsun Hwang, 2016. "Functional Generalized Structured Component Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(4), pages 940-968, December.
    12. Michio Yamamoto, 2012. "Clustering of functional data in a low-dimensional subspace," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 6(3), pages 219-247, October.
    13. Takane, Yoshio, 2016. "My Early Interactions with Jan and Some of His Lost Papers," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 73(i07).
    14. Zhou, Lixing & Takane, Yoshio & Hwang, Heungsun, 2016. "Dynamic GSCANO (Generalized Structured Canonical Correlation Analysis) with applications to the analysis of effective connectivity in functional neuroimaging data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 93-109.
    15. Seohee Park & Seongeun Kim & Ji Hoon Ryoo, 2020. "Latent Class Regression Utilizing Fuzzy Clusterwise Generalized Structured Component Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    16. John C. Gower & Sugnet Gardner-Lubbe & Niel J. Le Roux, 2018. "Interaction: Fisher’s Optimal Scores Revisited," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(1), pages 92-112, March.
    17. Maria Giovanna Onorati & Francesco D. d’Ovidio & Laura Antonucci, 2017. "Cultural displacement as a lever to global-ready student profiles: results from a longitudinal study on International Lifelong Learning Programs (LLP)," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 545-563, March.
    18. Monica Billio & Roberto Casarin & Matteo Iacopini & Sylvia Kaufmann, 2023. "Bayesian Dynamic Tensor Regression," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 429-439, April.
    19. Heungsun Hwang & Moon-Ho Ho & Jonathan Lee, 2010. "Generalized Structured Component Analysis with Latent Interactions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(2), pages 228-242, June.
    20. Henk Kiers, 1997. "A modification of the SINDCLUS algorithm for fitting the ADCLUS and INDCLUS models," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 14(2), pages 297-310, September.
    21. Lukáš Sobíšek & Hana Řezanková, 2011. "Comparison of Dimensionality Reduction Methods Applied to Ordinal Variables [Srovnání metod pro redukci dimenzionality aplikovaných na ordinální proměnné]," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2011(1), pages 3-19.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:63:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-021-01275-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.