IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v58y2024i1d10.1007_s11135-023-01637-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do money and guilt primes affect the likelihood of theft by taking? Findings from a visualized scenario study

Author

Listed:
  • Ann Buck

    (Ghent University)

  • Wim Hardyns

    (Ghent University)

  • Lieven J. R. Pauwels

    (Ghent University)

Abstract

In this article, we report on the results of two experimental manipulations in a visual scenario survey experiment. We explored to what extent a conceptual money and guilt priming task combined with random assignment to a manipulated scenario condition affects the likelihood of theft by taking and anticipated guilt. Data are taken from a region-wide convenience sample of adolescents and young adults (N = 3564). Six subgroups of participants are created based on two experimental manipulations. Firstly, before being presented with a visual scenario vignette depicting the act of stealing a small amount of money, survey participants are randomly assigned to a scrambled sentence test in which the concepts of money or guilt are primed. Secondly, each participant is again randomly assigned to either a visual scenario condition in which a witness is present or to a visual scenario condition in which no one is present. MANOVA is used to test the differences between the subgroups across two dependent variables simultaneously: the likelihood of theft by taking, and anticipated guilt. Results show no significant differences between the experimental conditions and the control condition for the dependent variables. Implications of the findings are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann Buck & Wim Hardyns & Lieven J. R. Pauwels, 2024. "Do money and guilt primes affect the likelihood of theft by taking? Findings from a visualized scenario study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 307-327, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01637-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-023-01637-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-023-01637-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-023-01637-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefanie Eifler, 2007. "Evaluating the Validity of Self-Reported Deviant Behavior Using Vignette Analyses," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 303-318, April.
    2. Kouchaki, Maryam & Smith-Crowe, Kristin & Brief, Arthur P. & Sousa, Carlos, 2013. "Seeing green: Mere exposure to money triggers a business decision frame and unethical outcomes," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 53-61.
    3. Caro, Francis G. & Ho, Teck H. & McFadden, Daniel L. & Gottlieb, Alison S. & Yee, Christine & Chan, Taizan & Winter, Joachim, 2012. "Using the internet to administer more realistic vignette experiments," Munich Reprints in Economics 19971, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu-Ming Tseng, 2019. "How Implicit Ethics Institutionalization Affects Ethical Selling Intention: The Case of Taiwan’s Life Insurance Salespeople," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 727-742, September.
    2. Valerio Capraro, 2018. "Gender differences in lying in sender-receiver games: A meta-analysis," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 13(4), pages 345-355, July.
    3. de Grip, Andries & Fouarge, Didier & Montizaan, Raymond, 2020. "Redistribution of individual pension wealth to survivor pensions: Evidence from a stated preferences analysis," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 402-421.
    4. Caro, Francis G. & Yee, Christine & Levien, Samantha & Gottlieb, Alison S. & Winter, Joachim & McFadden, Daniel L. & Ho, Teck H., 2012. "Choosing among residential options: Results of a vignette experiment," Munich Reprints in Economics 19970, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    5. Poonam Arora & Gwendolyn A. Tedeschi & Janet L. Rovenpor, 2018. "Broadening the Frame around Sustainability with Holistic Language: Mandela and Invictus," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 233-251, December.
    6. Elena Druică & Călin Vâlsan & Rodica Ianole-Călin & Răzvan Mihail-Papuc & Irena Munteanu, 2019. "Exploring the Link between Academic Dishonesty and Economic Delinquency: A Partial Least Squares Path Modeling Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Hunt, Nicholas C. & Curtis, Mary B. & Rixom, Jessica M., 2022. "Financial priming, psychological distance, and recognizing financial misreporting as an ethical issue: The role of financial reporting responsibility," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Long Wang & J. Keith Murnighan, 2017. "How Much Does Honesty Cost? Small Bonuses Can Motivate Ethical Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(9), pages 2903-2914, September.
    9. Desai, Sreedhari D. & Kouchaki, Maryam, 2015. "Work-report formats and overbilling: How unit-reporting vs. cost-reporting increases accountability and decreases overbilling," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 79-88.
    10. Elsayed, Ahmed & de Grip, Andries & Fouarge, Didier & Montizaan, Raymond, 2018. "Gradual retirement, financial incentives, and labour supply of older workers: Evidence from a stated preference analysis," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 277-294.
    11. Kanze, Dana & Conley, Mark A. & Higgins, E. Tory, 2021. "The motivation of mission statements: How regulatory mode influences workplace discrimination," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 84-103.
    12. Erik G. Helzer & Taya R. Cohen & Yeonjeong Kim, 2023. "The Character Lens: A Person-Centered Perspective on Moral Recognition and Ethical Decision-Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(2), pages 483-500, January.
    13. Hong Zhang & Jiawei Zhu & Li Wei & Wenting Zhang, 2021. "A Comparison between the Psychological Benefits of Giving Money vs. Giving Time," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 2677-2701, August.
    14. Jennifer Kunz & Stefan Linder, 2015. "With a view to make things better: individual characteristics and intentions to engage in management innovation," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 19(3), pages 525-556, August.
    15. Bohns, Vanessa K. & Newark, Daniel A. & Xu, Amy Z., 2016. "For a dollar, would you…? How (we think) money affects compliance with our requests," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 45-62.
    16. Jean-Francois Gajewski & Marco Heimann & Luc Meunier, 2022. "Nudges in SRI: The Power of the Default Option," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(3), pages 547-566, May.
    17. McKenzie R. Rees & Ann E. Tenbrunsel & Kristina A. Diekmann, 2022. "“It’s Just Business”: Understanding How Business Frames Differ from Ethical Frames and the Effect on Unethical Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(3), pages 429-449, March.
    18. Arjun Mitra & Corinne Post & Steve Sauerwald, 2021. "Evaluating Board Candidates: A Threat-Contingency Model of Shareholder Dissent Against Female Director Candidates," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 86-110, January.
    19. Abraham, Martin & Auspurg, Katrin & Bähr, Sebastian & Frodermann, Corinna & Gundert, Stefanie & Hinz, Thomas, 2013. "Unemployment and willingness to accept job offers : results of a factorial survey experiment (Arbeitslosigkeit und Stellenannahmebereitschaft : Erste Ergebnisse eines Faktoriellen Survey Moduls)," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 46(4), pages 283-305.
    20. Smulowitz, Stephen J. & Almandoz, Juan (“John”), 2021. "Reprint of “Predicting employee wrongdoing: The complementary effect of CEO option pay and the pay gap”," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 104-116.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01637-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.