Author
Listed:
- Rico H Herzog
(TU Delft, Netherlands
HafenCity University Hamburg, Germany)
- Juliana E Gonçalves
(TU Delft, Netherlands)
- Geertje Slingerland
(TU Delft, Netherlands)
- Reinout Kleinhans
(TU Delft, Netherlands)
- Holger Prang
(HafenCity University Hamburg, Germany)
- Frances Brazier
(TU Delft, Netherlands)
- Trivik Verma
(TU Delft, Netherlands)
Abstract
Identifying the diverse and often competing values of citizens, and resolving the consequent public value conflicts, are of significant importance for inclusive and integrated urban development. Scholars have highlighted that relational, value-laden urban space gives rise to many diverse conflicts that vary both spatially and temporally. Although notions of public value conflicts have been conceived in theory, there are few empirical studies that identify such values and their conflicts in urban space. Building on public value theory and using a case-study mixed-methods approach, this paper proposes a new approach to empirically investigate public value conflicts in urban space. Using unstructured participatory data of 4528 citizen contributions from a Public Participation Geographic Information Systems in Hamburg, Germany, natural language processing and spatial clustering techniques are used to identify areas of potential value conflicts. Four expert interviews assess and interpret these quantitative findings. By integrating quantitative assessments with the qualitative findings of the interviews, we identify 19 general public values and nine archetypical conflicts. On the basis of these results, this paper proposes a new conceptual model of ‘Public Value Spheres’ that extends the understanding of public value conflicts and helps to further account for the value-laden nature of urban space.
Suggested Citation
Rico H Herzog & Juliana E Gonçalves & Geertje Slingerland & Reinout Kleinhans & Holger Prang & Frances Brazier & Trivik Verma, 2024.
"Cities for citizens! Public value spheres for understanding conflicts in urban planning,"
Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(7), pages 1327-1344, May.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:61:y:2024:i:7:p:1327-1344
DOI: 10.1177/00420980231207475
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:61:y:2024:i:7:p:1327-1344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.